* disabled the button itself, but added the tooltip to the form, because it didn't work for the button and likely has something to do with JS
* added an integration test to verify the new logic
## Preview
|Signed in|Guest|
|-|-|
|||
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4095
Reviewed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
This Fixes#3962 by adding `!important` to the margin of the heading in the rendered markdown.
In the current behaviour, the margin-top was always overridden by a global css-rule. This is prevented by this change.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4076
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-committed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Also convert a comment into a warning in the logs when the deletion of
an artifact cannot find the file in the destination storage.
The case were an error happens while deleting the file is not covered
as it would require to mock the storage.Copy function.
Change the copy to use `ActionsArtifact.StoragePath` instead of the
`ArtifactPath`. Skip artifacts that are expired, and don't error if the
file to copy does not exist.
---
When trying to migrate actions artifact storage from local to MinIO, we
encountered errors that prevented the process from completing
successfully:
* The migration tries to copy the files using the per-run
`ArtifactPath`, instead of the unique `StoragePath`.
* Artifacts that have been marked expired and had their files deleted
would throw an error
* Artifacts that are pending, but don't have a file uploaded yet will
throw an error.
This PR addresses these cases, and allow the process to complete
successfully.
(cherry picked from commit 8de8972baf5d82ff7b58ed77d78e8e1869e64eb5)
Adds a feature similar to this https://github.blog/changelog/2021-11-24-specify-theme-context-for-images-in-markdown/ , by adding styles to elements which `src` or `href` attribute ends with `#light-mode-only` or `#dark-mode-only`. To improve compability, the github variants with the `gh-` prefix are also contained.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3985
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Currently the collapsed sections on the installation page have bad visibility, clickability and don't look good. This commit attempts to improve this. It is also worth noting that the amount of these sections might increase.
### Changes
* make custom style for these collapsible sections of the form. This is not a standard design to Forgejo, but we also don't have forms this large anywhere else, and it's fit in a few small CSS rules, so I think that's justified. I'm curious how it looks to others visually, good or bad.
* improve the positioning of the installation location hint.
* remove very rare occasion of dashed horizontal divider as this rule is no longer needed with the new borders. It was [added](c16ae1ab39 (diff-f8dad1e2c95a9e959d4688c763f3e02d1878c8e0)) just a month ago and had a visual bug with duplicated dividers.
### Preview
|Before|After|
|-|-|
|||
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4062
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
This is a PR for #3616
Currently added a new optional config `SLOGAN` in ini file. When this config is set title page is modified in APP_NAME [ - SLOGAN]
Example in image below
Add the new config value in the admin settings page (readonly)
## TODO
* [x] Add the possibility to add the `SLOGAN` config from the installation form
* [ ] Update https://forgejo.org/docs/next/admin/config-cheat-sheet
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3752
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: mirko <mirko.perillo@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: mirko <mirko.perillo@gmail.com>
We're stuck on an old version of golang deadcode. Renovate is confused by it's rename in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4043.
I don't remember how to use this tool to test it, let's see how the CI reacts to this PR.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4048
Reviewed-by: Victoria <efertone@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
