Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-11-27 04:06:10 +01:00
forgejo/modules/templates/eval/eval.go
wxiaoguang 5b89670a31
Use a general Eval function for expressions in templates. (#23927)
One of the proposals in #23328

This PR introduces a simple expression calculator
(templates/eval/eval.go), it can do basic expression calculations.

Many untested template helper functions like `Mul` `Add` can be replaced
by this new approach.

Then these `Add` / `Mul` / `percentage` / `Subtract` / `DiffStatsWidth`
could all use this `Eval`.

And it provides enhancements for Golang templates, and improves
readability.

Some examples:

----

* Before: `{{Add (Mul $glyph.Row 12) 12}}`
* After: `{{Eval $glyph.Row "*" 12 "+" 12}}`

----

* Before: `{{if lt (Add $i 1) (len $.Topics)}}`
* After: `{{if Eval $i "+" 1 "<" (len $.Topics)}}`

## FAQ

### Why not use an existing expression package?

We need a highly customized expression engine:

* do the calculation on the fly, without pre-compiling
* deal with int/int64/float64 types, to make the result could be used in
Golang template.
* make the syntax could be used in the Golang template directly
* do not introduce too much complex or strange syntax, we just need a
simple calculator.
* it needs to strictly follow Golang template's behavior, for example,
Golang template treats all non-zero values as truth, but many 3rd
packages don't do so.

### What's the benefit?

* Developers don't need to add more `Add`/`Mul`/`Sub`-like functions,
they were getting more and more.
Now, only one `Eval` is enough for all cases.
* The new code reads better than old `{{Add (Mul $glyph.Row 12) 12}}`,
the old one isn't familiar to most procedural programming developers
(eg, the Golang expression syntax).
* The `Eval` is fully covered by tests, many old `Add`/`Mul`-like
functions were never tested.

### The performance?

It doesn't use `reflect`, it doesn't need to parse or compile when used
in Golang template, the performance is as fast as native Go template.

### Is it too complex? Could it be unstable?

The expression calculator program is a common homework for computer
science students, and it's widely used as a teaching and practicing
purpose for developers. The algorithm is pretty well-known.

The behavior can be clearly defined, it is stable.
2023-04-07 21:25:49 +08:00

345 lines
7.5 KiB
Go

// Copyright 2023 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package eval
import (
"fmt"
"strconv"
"strings"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
)
type Num struct {
Value any // int64 or float64, nil on error
}
var opPrecedence = map[string]int{
// "(": 1, this is for low precedence like function calls, they are handled separately
"or": 2,
"and": 3,
"not": 4,
"==": 5, "!=": 5, "<": 5, "<=": 5, ">": 5, ">=": 5,
"+": 6, "-": 6,
"*": 7, "/": 7,
}
type stack[T any] struct {
name string
elems []T
}
func (s *stack[T]) push(t T) {
s.elems = append(s.elems, t)
}
func (s *stack[T]) pop() T {
if len(s.elems) == 0 {
panic(s.name + " stack is empty")
}
t := s.elems[len(s.elems)-1]
s.elems = s.elems[:len(s.elems)-1]
return t
}
func (s *stack[T]) peek() T {
if len(s.elems) == 0 {
panic(s.name + " stack is empty")
}
return s.elems[len(s.elems)-1]
}
type operator string
type eval struct {
stackNum stack[Num]
stackOp stack[operator]
funcMap map[string]func([]Num) Num
}
func newEval() *eval {
e := &eval{}
e.stackNum.name = "num"
e.stackOp.name = "op"
return e
}
func toNum(v any) (Num, error) {
switch v := v.(type) {
case string:
if strings.Contains(v, ".") {
n, err := strconv.ParseFloat(v, 64)
if err != nil {
return Num{n}, err
}
return Num{n}, nil
}
n, err := strconv.ParseInt(v, 10, 64)
if err != nil {
return Num{n}, err
}
return Num{n}, nil
case float32, float64:
n, _ := util.ToFloat64(v)
return Num{n}, nil
default:
n, err := util.ToInt64(v)
if err != nil {
return Num{n}, err
}
return Num{n}, nil
}
}
func truth(b bool) int64 {
if b {
return int64(1)
}
return int64(0)
}
func applyOp2Generic[T int64 | float64](op operator, n1, n2 T) Num {
switch op {
case "+":
return Num{n1 + n2}
case "-":
return Num{n1 - n2}
case "*":
return Num{n1 * n2}
case "/":
return Num{n1 / n2}
case "==":
return Num{truth(n1 == n2)}
case "!=":
return Num{truth(n1 != n2)}
case "<":
return Num{truth(n1 < n2)}
case "<=":
return Num{truth(n1 <= n2)}
case ">":
return Num{truth(n1 > n2)}
case ">=":
return Num{truth(n1 >= n2)}
case "and":
t1, _ := util.ToFloat64(n1)
t2, _ := util.ToFloat64(n2)
return Num{truth(t1 != 0 && t2 != 0)}
case "or":
t1, _ := util.ToFloat64(n1)
t2, _ := util.ToFloat64(n2)
return Num{truth(t1 != 0 || t2 != 0)}
}
panic("unknown operator: " + string(op))
}
func applyOp2(op operator, n1, n2 Num) Num {
float := false
if _, ok := n1.Value.(float64); ok {
float = true
} else if _, ok = n2.Value.(float64); ok {
float = true
}
if float {
f1, _ := util.ToFloat64(n1.Value)
f2, _ := util.ToFloat64(n2.Value)
return applyOp2Generic(op, f1, f2)
}
return applyOp2Generic(op, n1.Value.(int64), n2.Value.(int64))
}
func toOp(v any) (operator, error) {
if v, ok := v.(string); ok {
return operator(v), nil
}
return "", fmt.Errorf(`unsupported token type "%T"`, v)
}
func (op operator) hasOpenBracket() bool {
return strings.HasSuffix(string(op), "(") // it's used to support functions like "sum("
}
func (op operator) isComma() bool {
return op == ","
}
func (op operator) isCloseBracket() bool {
return op == ")"
}
type ExprError struct {
msg string
tokens []any
err error
}
func (err ExprError) Error() string {
sb := strings.Builder{}
sb.WriteString(err.msg)
sb.WriteString(" [ ")
for _, token := range err.tokens {
_, _ = fmt.Fprintf(&sb, `"%v" `, token)
}
sb.WriteString("]")
if err.err != nil {
sb.WriteString(": ")
sb.WriteString(err.err.Error())
}
return sb.String()
}
func (err ExprError) Unwrap() error {
return err.err
}
func (e *eval) applyOp() {
op := e.stackOp.pop()
if op == "not" {
num := e.stackNum.pop()
i, _ := util.ToInt64(num.Value)
e.stackNum.push(Num{truth(i == 0)})
} else if op.hasOpenBracket() || op.isCloseBracket() || op.isComma() {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("incomplete sub-expression with operator %q", op))
} else {
num2 := e.stackNum.pop()
num1 := e.stackNum.pop()
e.stackNum.push(applyOp2(op, num1, num2))
}
}
func (e *eval) exec(tokens ...any) (ret Num, err error) {
defer func() {
if r := recover(); r != nil {
rErr, ok := r.(error)
if !ok {
rErr = fmt.Errorf("%v", r)
}
err = ExprError{"invalid expression", tokens, rErr}
}
}()
for _, token := range tokens {
n, err := toNum(token)
if err == nil {
e.stackNum.push(n)
continue
}
op, err := toOp(token)
if err != nil {
return Num{}, ExprError{"invalid expression", tokens, err}
}
switch {
case op.hasOpenBracket():
e.stackOp.push(op)
case op.isCloseBracket(), op.isComma():
var stackTopOp operator
for len(e.stackOp.elems) > 0 {
stackTopOp = e.stackOp.peek()
if stackTopOp.hasOpenBracket() || stackTopOp.isComma() {
break
}
e.applyOp()
}
if op.isCloseBracket() {
nums := []Num{e.stackNum.pop()}
for !e.stackOp.peek().hasOpenBracket() {
stackTopOp = e.stackOp.pop()
if !stackTopOp.isComma() {
return Num{}, ExprError{"bracket doesn't match", tokens, nil}
}
nums = append(nums, e.stackNum.pop())
}
for i, j := 0, len(nums)-1; i < j; i, j = i+1, j-1 {
nums[i], nums[j] = nums[j], nums[i] // reverse nums slice, to get the right order for arguments
}
stackTopOp = e.stackOp.pop()
fn := string(stackTopOp[:len(stackTopOp)-1])
if fn == "" {
if len(nums) != 1 {
return Num{}, ExprError{"too many values in one bracket", tokens, nil}
}
e.stackNum.push(nums[0])
} else if f, ok := e.funcMap[fn]; ok {
e.stackNum.push(f(nums))
} else {
return Num{}, ExprError{"unknown function: " + fn, tokens, nil}
}
} else {
e.stackOp.push(op)
}
default:
for len(e.stackOp.elems) > 0 && len(e.stackNum.elems) > 0 {
stackTopOp := e.stackOp.peek()
if stackTopOp.hasOpenBracket() || stackTopOp.isComma() || precedence(stackTopOp, op) < 0 {
break
}
e.applyOp()
}
e.stackOp.push(op)
}
}
for len(e.stackOp.elems) > 0 && !e.stackOp.peek().isComma() {
e.applyOp()
}
if len(e.stackNum.elems) != 1 {
return Num{}, ExprError{fmt.Sprintf("expect 1 value as final result, but there are %d", len(e.stackNum.elems)), tokens, nil}
}
return e.stackNum.pop(), nil
}
func precedence(op1, op2 operator) int {
p1 := opPrecedence[string(op1)]
p2 := opPrecedence[string(op2)]
if p1 == 0 {
panic("unknown operator precedence: " + string(op1))
} else if p2 == 0 {
panic("unknown operator precedence: " + string(op2))
}
return p1 - p2
}
func castFloat64(nums []Num) bool {
hasFloat := false
for _, num := range nums {
if _, hasFloat = num.Value.(float64); hasFloat {
break
}
}
if hasFloat {
for i, num := range nums {
if _, ok := num.Value.(float64); !ok {
f, _ := util.ToFloat64(num.Value)
nums[i] = Num{f}
}
}
}
return hasFloat
}
func fnSum(nums []Num) Num {
if castFloat64(nums) {
var sum float64
for _, num := range nums {
sum += num.Value.(float64)
}
return Num{sum}
}
var sum int64
for _, num := range nums {
sum += num.Value.(int64)
}
return Num{sum}
}
// Expr evaluates the given expression tokens and returns the result.
// It supports the following operators: +, -, *, /, and, or, not, ==, !=, >, >=, <, <=.
// Non-zero values are treated as true, zero values are treated as false.
// If no error occurs, the result is either an int64 or a float64.
// If all numbers are integer, the result is an int64, otherwise if there is any float number, the result is a float64.
func Expr(tokens ...any) (Num, error) {
e := newEval()
e.funcMap = map[string]func([]Num) Num{"sum": fnSum}
return e.exec(tokens...)
}