Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-12-01 22:36:10 +01:00
forgejo/web_src/css/shared/flex-list.css
silverwind 51f6c3a059
Forbid deprecated break-word in CSS (#30934)
Forbid
[deprecated](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/#word-break-property)
`break-word` and fix all occurences.

Regarding `overflow-wrap: break-word` vs `overflow-wrap: anywhere`:

Example of difference: https://jsfiddle.net/silverwind/1va6972r/

[Here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77651244) it says:

> The differences between normal, break-word and anywhere are only clear
if you are using width: min-content on the element containing the text,
and you also set a max-width. A pretty rare scenario.

I don't think this difference will make any practical impact as we are
not hitting this rare scenario.

(cherry picked from commit 5556782ebeb1ca4d17e2fff434b11651887b9899)
2024-05-12 20:03:10 +02:00

109 lines
2.4 KiB
CSS

.flex-list {
list-style: none;
}
.flex-item {
display: flex;
gap: 8px;
align-items: flex-start;
padding: 10px 0;
}
.flex-item .flex-item-leading {
display: flex;
align-items: flex-start;
}
.flex-item .flex-item-main {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
flex-grow: 1;
flex-basis: 60%; /* avoid wrapping the "flex-item-trailing" too aggressively */
min-width: 0; /* make the "text truncate" work, otherwise the flex axis is not limited and the text just overflows */
}
.flex-item-header {
display: flex;
gap: .25rem;
justify-content: space-between;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.flex-item a:not(.label, .button):hover {
color: var(--color-primary) !important;
}
.flex-item .flex-item-icon {
align-self: baseline; /* mainly used by the issue list, to align the leading icon with the title */
}
.flex-item .flex-item-icon + .flex-item-main {
align-self: baseline;
}
.flex-item .flex-item-trailing {
display: flex;
gap: 0.5rem;
align-items: center;
flex-grow: 0;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: end;
}
.flex-item .flex-item-title {
display: inline-flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
align-items: center;
gap: .25rem;
max-width: 100%;
color: var(--color-text);
font-size: 16px;
font-weight: var(--font-weight-semibold);
overflow-wrap: anywhere;
min-width: 0;
}
.flex-item .flex-item-title a {
color: var(--color-text);
overflow-wrap: anywhere;
}
.flex-item .flex-item-body {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: .25rem;
color: var(--color-text-light-2);
overflow-wrap: anywhere;
}
.flex-item .flex-item-body a {
color: inherit;
overflow-wrap: anywhere;
}
.flex-list > .flex-item + .flex-item {
border-top: 1px solid var(--color-secondary);
}
/* Fomantic UI segment has default "padding: 1em", so here it removes the padding-top and padding-bottom accordingly (there might also be some `tw-hidden` siblings).
Developers could also use "flex-space-fitted" class to remove the first item's padding-top and the last item's padding-bottom */
.flex-list.flex-space-fitted > .flex-item:first-child,
.ui.segment > .flex-list > .flex-item:first-child {
padding-top: 0;
}
.flex-list.flex-space-fitted > .flex-item:last-child,
.ui.segment > .flex-list > .flex-item:last-child {
padding-bottom: 0;
}
/* If there is a divider besides the flex-list, some padding/margin are not needs */
.divider + .flex-list > .flex-item:first-child {
padding-top: 0;
}
.flex-list + .divider {
margin-top: 0;
}