mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo
synced 2024-11-22 09:54:24 +01:00
261fc87673
This is a continuation of #2728, with a test case added.
Fixes #2633.
I kept @zareck 's commit as is, because I believe it is correct. We can't move the check to `owner.CanForkRepo()`, because `owner` is the future owner of the forked repo, and may be an organization. We need to check the admin permission of the `doer`, like in the case of repository creation.
I verified that the test fails without the `ForkRepository` change, and passes with it.
Co-authored-by: Cassio Zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3277
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Co-committed-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
e2e | ||
fuzz | ||
gitea-lfs-meta | ||
gitea-repositories-meta | ||
integration | ||
testdata/data/attachments/a/0 | ||
mssql.ini.tmpl | ||
mysql.ini.tmpl | ||
pgsql.ini.tmpl | ||
sqlite.ini.tmpl | ||
test_utils.go |