9057100182
Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
fixtures | ||
shared | ||
actions.test.e2e.ts | ||
changes.go | ||
dashboard-ci-status.test.e2e.ts | ||
debugserver_test.go | ||
declare_repos_test.go | ||
e2e_test.go | ||
example.test.e2e.ts | ||
explore.test.e2e.ts | ||
git-notes.test.e2e.ts | ||
issue-comment.test.e2e.ts | ||
issue-sidebar.test.e2e.ts | ||
markdown-editor.test.e2e.ts | ||
markup.test.e2e.ts | ||
org-settings.test.e2e.ts | ||
profile_actions.test.e2e.ts | ||
reaction-selectors.test.e2e.ts | ||
README.md | ||
release.test.e2e.ts | ||
repo-code.test.e2e.ts | ||
repo-commitgraph.test.e2e.ts | ||
repo-migrate.test.e2e.ts | ||
repo-settings.test.e2e.ts | ||
repo-wiki.test.e2e.ts | ||
right-settings-button.test.e2e.ts | ||
utils_e2e.ts | ||
utils_e2e_test.go | ||
webauthn.test.e2e.ts |
End to end tests
Thank you for your effort to provide good software tests for Forgejo. Please also read the general testing instructions in the Forgejo contributor documentation and make sure to also check the Playwright documentation for further information.
This file is meant to provide specific information for the integration tests as well as some tips and tricks you should know.
Feel free to extend this file with more instructions if you feel like you have something to share!
How to run the tests?
Before running any tests, please ensure you perform a clean frontend build:
make clean frontend
Whenever you modify frontend code (i.e. JavaScript and CSS files), you need to create a new frontend build.
For tests that require interactive Git repos, you also need to ensure a Forgejo binary is ready to be used by Git hooks. For this, you additionally need to run
make TAGS="sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify" backend
Install dependencies
Browsertesting is performed by playwright. You need certain system libraries and playwright will download required browsers. Playwright takes care of this when you run:
npx playwright install-deps
Note
On some operating systems, the installation of missing libraries can complicate testing certain browsers. It is often not necessary to test with all browsers locally. Choosing either Firefox or Chromium is fine.
Run all tests
If you want to run the full test suite, you can use
make test-e2e-sqlite
Interactive testing
We recommend that you use interactive testing for the development. After you performed the required builds, you should use one shell to start the debugserver (and leave it running):
make test-e2e-debugserver
It allows you to explore the test data in your local browser, and playwright to perform tests on it.
Note
The modifications persist while the debugserver is running. If you modified things, it might be useful to restart it to get back to a fresh state. While writing playwright tests, you either need to ensure they are resilient against repeated runs (e.g. when only creating new content), or that they restore the initial state for the next browser run.
With the playwright UI:
Playwright ships with an integrated UI mode which allows you to run individual tests and to debug them by seeing detailed traces of what playwright does. Launch it with:
npx playwright test --ui
Running individual tests
npx playwright test actions.test.e2e.ts:9
First, specify the complete test filename, and after the colon you can put the linenumber where the test is defined.
With VSCodium or VSCode
To debug a test, you can also use "Playwright Test" for VScodium or VSCode.
Run all tests via local act_runner
If you have a forgejo runner, you can use it to run the test jobs:
forgejo-runner exec -W .forgejo/workflows/testing.yml -j test-e2e
Note that the CI workflow has some logic to run tests based on changed files only. This might conflict with your local setup and not run all the desired tests because it might only look at file changes in your latest commit.
Run e2e tests with another database
This approach is not currently used, neither in the CI/CD nor by core contributors on their lcoal machines. It is still documented for the sake of completeness: You can also perform e2e tests using MariaDB/MySQL or PostgreSQL if you want.
Setup a MySQL database inside docker
docker run -e "MYSQL_DATABASE=test" -e "MYSQL_ALLOW_EMPTY_PASSWORD=yes" -p 3306:3306 --rm --name mysql mysql:latest #(Ctrl-c to stop the database)
Start tests based on the database container
TEST_MYSQL_HOST=localhost:3306 TEST_MYSQL_DBNAME=test?multiStatements=true TEST_MYSQL_USERNAME=root TEST_MYSQL_PASSWORD='' make test-e2e-mysql
Setup a pgsql database inside docker
docker run -e POSTGRES_DB=test -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=password -p 5432:5432 --rm --name pgsql postgres:latest #(Ctrl-c to stop the database)
Start tests based on the database container
TEST_PGSQL_HOST=localhost:5432 TEST_PGSQL_DBNAME=test TEST_PGSQL_USERNAME=postgres TEST_PGSQL_PASSWORD=postgres make test-e2e-pgsql
Running individual tests
Example command to run example.test.e2e.ts
test file:
Note
Unlike integration tests, this filtering is at the file level, not function
For SQLite:
make test-e2e-sqlite#example
Visual testing
Warning
This is not currently used by most Forgejo contributors. Your help to improve the situation and allow for visual testing is appreciated.
Although the main goal of e2e is assertion testing, we have added a framework for visual regress testing. If you are working on front-end features, please use the following:
- Check out
main
,make clean frontend
, and run e2e tests withVISUAL_TEST=1
to generate outputs. This will initially fail, as no screenshots exist. You can run the e2e tests again to assert it passes. - Check out your branch,
make clean frontend
, and run e2e tests withVISUAL_TEST=1
. You should be able to assert you front-end changes don't break any other tests unintentionally.
VISUAL_TEST=1 will create screenshots in tests/e2e/test-snapshots. The test will fail the first time this is enabled (until we get visual test image persistence figured out), because it will be testing against an empty screenshot folder.
ACCEPT_VISUAL=1 will overwrite the snapshot images with new images.
Tips and tricks
If you know noteworthy tests that can act as an inspiration for new tests, please add some details here.
Understanding and waiting for page loads
Waiting for a load state sound like a convenient way to ensure the page was loaded, but it only works once and consecutive calls to it (e.g. after clicking a button which should reload a page) return immediately without waiting for another load event.
If you match something which is on both the old and the new page,
you might succeed before the page was reloaded,
although the code using a waitForLoadState
might intuitively suggest
the page was changed before.
Interacting with the page before the reload (e.g. by opening a dropdown) might then race and result in flaky tests, depending on the speed of the hardware running the test.
A possible way to test that an interaction worked is by checking for a known change first. For example:
- you submit a form and you want to check that the content persisted
- checking for the content directly would succeed even without a page reload
- check for a success message first (will wait until it appears), then verify the content
Alternatively, if you know the backend request that will be made before the reload, you can explicitly wait for it:
const submitted = page.waitForResponse('/my/backend/post/request');
await page.locator('button').first().click(); // perform your interaction
await submitted;
If the page redirects to another URL, you can alternatively use:
await page.waitForURL('**/target.html');
Only sign in if necessary
Signing in takes time and is actually executed step-by-step. If your test does not rely on a user account, skip this step.
test('For anyone', async ({page}) => {
await page.goto('/somepage');
If you need a user account, you can use something like:
import {test, login_user, login} from './utils_e2e.ts';
test.beforeAll(async ({browser}, workerInfo) => {
await login_user(browser, workerInfo, 'user2'); // or another user
});
test('For signed users only', async ({browser}, workerInfo) => {
const page = await login({browser}, workerInfo);
Run tests very selectively
Browser testing can take some time. If you want to iterate fast, save your time and only run very selected tests. Use only one browser.
Skip Safari if it doesn't work
Many contributors have issues getting Safari (webkit) and especially Safari Mobile to work.
At the top of your test function, you can use:
test.skip(workerInfo.project.name === 'Mobile Safari', 'Unable to get tests working on Safari Mobile.');
Don't forget the formatting.
When writing tests without modifying other frontend code, it is easy to forget that the JavaScript test files also need formatting.
Run make lint-frontend-fix
.
Define new repos
Take a look at declare_repos_test.go
to see how to add your repositories.
Feel free to improve the logic used there if you need more advanced functionality
(it is a simplified version of the code used in the integration tests).
Accessibility testing
If you can, perform automated accessibility testing using AxeCore.
Take a look at shared/forms.ts
and some other places for inspiration.
List related files coverage
To speed up the CI pipelines and avoid running expensive tests too often, only a selection of tests is run by default, based on the changed files.
At the top of each playwright test file, list the files or file patterns that are covered by your test. Often, these are files that you modified for your feature or bugfix, or that you looked at (and might still have open in your IDE), because your fix depends on their behaviour.
Which files to watch?
The set of files your test "watches" depends on the kind of test you write. If you only test for the presence of an element and do no accessibility or placement checks, you won't detect broken visual appearance and there is little reason to watch CSS files.
However, if your test also checks that an element is correctly positioned (e.g. that it does not overflow the page), or has accessibiltiy properties (includes colour contrast), also list stylesheets that define the behaviour your test depends on.
Watching the place that generate the selectors you use (typically templates, but can also be JavaScript) is a must, to ensure that someone modifying the markup notices that your selectors fail (e.g. because an id or class was renamed).
If you are unsure about the exact set of files, feel free to ask other contributors.
How to specify the patterns?
You put filenames and patterns as blocks between two // @watch
comments.
An example that watches changes on (in order)
a single file,
a full recursive subfolder,
two files with a shorthand pattern,
and a set of files with a certain ending:
// @watch start
// templates/webhook/shared-settings.tmpl
// templates/repo/settings/**
// web_src/css/{form,repo}.css
// web_src/css/modules/*.css
// @watch end
The patterns are evaluated on a "first-match" basis. Under the hood, gobwas/glob is used.
Grouped retry for interactions
Sometimes, it can be necessary to retry certain interactions together. Consider the following procedure:
- click to open a dropdown
- interact with content in the dropdown
When for some reason the dropdown does not open, for example because of it taking time to initialize after page load, the click will succeed, but the depending interaction won't, although playwright repeatedly tries to find the content.
You can group statements using toPasshttps://playwright.dev/docs/test-assertions#expecttopass). This code retries the dropdown click until the second item is found.
await expect(async () => {
await page.locator('.dropdown').click();
await page.locator('.dropdown .item').first().click();
}).toPass();