mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo
synced 2024-12-11 14:01:58 +01:00
c53ad052d8
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier than before. - All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is `InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function will load common settings. - It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to `loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less confusing. - Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that. Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit` function? Any idea? --------- Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
40 lines
910 B
Go
40 lines
910 B
Go
// Copyright 2020 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
|
package issues_test
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"path/filepath"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
|
|
|
|
_ "code.gitea.io/gitea/models"
|
|
_ "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
|
|
_ "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func init() {
|
|
setting.SetCustomPathAndConf("", "", "")
|
|
setting.InitProviderAndLoadCommonSettingsForTest()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestFixturesAreConsistent(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
|
|
unittest.CheckConsistencyFor(t,
|
|
&issues_model.Issue{},
|
|
&issues_model.PullRequest{},
|
|
&issues_model.Milestone{},
|
|
&issues_model.Label{},
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
|
|
unittest.MainTest(m, &unittest.TestOptions{
|
|
GiteaRootPath: filepath.Join("..", ".."),
|
|
})
|
|
}
|