Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-11-27 12:16:10 +01:00
forgejo/routers/api/packages
Yaroslav Halchenko 2b2fd2728c Add codespell support and fix a good number of typos with its help (#3270)
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .

I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.

```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
	@echo " - lint-spell                       lint spelling"
	@echo " - lint-spell-fix                   lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml:      - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml:      - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
2024-05-09 13:49:37 +00:00
..
alpine Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
cargo remove util.OptionalBool and related functions (#29513) 2024-03-06 12:10:46 +08:00
chef remove util.OptionalBool and related functions (#29513) 2024-03-06 12:10:46 +08:00
composer remove util.OptionalBool and related functions (#29513) 2024-03-06 12:10:46 +08:00
conan Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
conda Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
container Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
cran Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
debian Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
generic Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
goproxy Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
helm remove util.OptionalBool and related functions (#29513) 2024-03-06 12:10:46 +08:00
helper Move context from modules to services (#29440) 2024-03-06 12:10:43 +08:00
maven Ignore useless error message "broken pipe" (#30801) 2024-05-05 12:15:40 +01:00
npm Add support for npm bundleDependencies (#30751) 2024-05-05 08:24:01 +01:00
nuget Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
pub Move context from modules to services (#29440) 2024-03-06 12:10:43 +08:00
pypi Move context from modules to services (#29440) 2024-03-06 12:10:43 +08:00
rpm Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
rubygems Enable more revive linter rules (#30608) 2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
swift remove util.OptionalBool and related functions (#29513) 2024-03-06 12:10:46 +08:00
vagrant Move context from modules to services (#29440) 2024-03-06 12:10:43 +08:00
api.go Move context from modules to services (#29440) 2024-03-06 12:10:43 +08:00
README.md Add codespell support and fix a good number of typos with its help (#3270) 2024-05-09 13:49:37 +00:00

Gitea Package Registry

This document gives a brief overview how the package registry is organized in code.

Structure

The package registry code is divided into multiple modules to split the functionality and make code reuse possible.

Module Description
models/packages Common methods and models used by all registry types
models/packages/<type> Methods used by specific registry type. There should be no need to use type specific models.
modules/packages Common methods and types used by multiple registry types
modules/packages/<type> Registry type specific methods and types (e.g. metadata extraction of package files)
routers/api/packages Route definitions for all registry types
routers/api/packages/<type> Route implementation for a specific registry type
services/packages Helper methods used by registry types to handle common tasks like package creation and deletion in routers
services/packages/<type> Registry type specific methods used by routers and services

Models

Every package registry implementation uses the same underlying models:

Model Description
Package The root of a package providing values fixed for every version (e.g. the package name)
PackageVersion A version of a package containing metadata (e.g. the package description)
PackageFile A file of a package describing its content (e.g. file name)
PackageBlob The content of a file (may be shared by multiple files)
PackageProperty Additional properties attached to Package, PackageVersion or PackageFile (e.g. used if metadata is needed for routing)

The following diagram shows the relationship between the models:

Package <1---*> PackageVersion <1---*> PackageFile <*---1> PackageBlob

Adding a new package registry type

Before adding a new package registry type have a look at the existing implementation to get an impression of how it could work. Most registry types offer endpoints to retrieve the metadata, upload and download package files. The upload endpoint is often the heavy part because it must validate the uploaded blob, extract metadata and create the models. The methods to validate and extract the metadata should be added in the modules/packages/<type> package. If the upload is valid the methods in services/packages allow to store the upload and create the corresponding models. It depends if the registry type allows multiple files per package version which method should be called:

  • CreatePackageAndAddFile: error if package version already exists
  • CreatePackageOrAddFileToExisting: error if file already exists
  • AddFileToExistingPackage: error if package version does not exist or file already exists

services/packages also contains helper methods to download a file or to remove a package version. There are no helper methods for metadata endpoints because they are very type specific.