mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo
synced 2024-11-30 22:06:11 +01:00
5db21ce7e1
This PR has multiple parts, and I didn't split them because it's not easy to test them separately since they are all about the dashboard page for issues. 1. Support counting issues via indexer to fix #26361 2. Fix repo selection so it also fixes #26653 3. Keep keywords in filter links. The first two are regressions of #26012. After: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/71dfea7e-d9e2-42b6-851a-cc081435c946 Thanks to @CaiCandong for helping with some tests.
149 lines
6.1 KiB
Go
149 lines
6.1 KiB
Go
// Copyright 2023 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
|
package internal
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// IndexerData data stored in the issue indexer
|
|
type IndexerData struct {
|
|
ID int64 `json:"id"`
|
|
RepoID int64 `json:"repo_id"`
|
|
IsPublic bool `json:"is_public"` // If the repo is public
|
|
|
|
// Fields used for keyword searching
|
|
Title string `json:"title"`
|
|
Content string `json:"content"`
|
|
Comments []string `json:"comments"`
|
|
|
|
// Fields used for filtering
|
|
IsPull bool `json:"is_pull"`
|
|
IsClosed bool `json:"is_closed"`
|
|
LabelIDs []int64 `json:"label_ids"`
|
|
NoLabel bool `json:"no_label"` // True if LabelIDs is empty
|
|
MilestoneID int64 `json:"milestone_id"`
|
|
ProjectID int64 `json:"project_id"`
|
|
ProjectBoardID int64 `json:"project_board_id"`
|
|
PosterID int64 `json:"poster_id"`
|
|
AssigneeID int64 `json:"assignee_id"`
|
|
MentionIDs []int64 `json:"mention_ids"`
|
|
ReviewedIDs []int64 `json:"reviewed_ids"`
|
|
ReviewRequestedIDs []int64 `json:"review_requested_ids"`
|
|
SubscriberIDs []int64 `json:"subscriber_ids"`
|
|
UpdatedUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `json:"updated_unix"`
|
|
|
|
// Fields used for sorting
|
|
// UpdatedUnix is both used for filtering and sorting.
|
|
// ID is used for sorting too, to make the sorting stable.
|
|
CreatedUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `json:"created_unix"`
|
|
DeadlineUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `json:"deadline_unix"`
|
|
CommentCount int64 `json:"comment_count"`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Match represents on search result
|
|
type Match struct {
|
|
ID int64 `json:"id"`
|
|
Score float64 `json:"score"`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// SearchResult represents search results
|
|
type SearchResult struct {
|
|
Total int64
|
|
Hits []Match
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// SearchOptions represents search options.
|
|
//
|
|
// It has a slightly different design from database query options.
|
|
// In database query options, a field is never a pointer, so it could be confusing when it's zero value:
|
|
// Do you want to find data with a field value of 0, or do you not specify the field in the options?
|
|
// To avoid this confusion, db introduced db.NoConditionID(-1).
|
|
// So zero value means the field is not specified in the search options, and db.NoConditionID means "== 0" or "id NOT IN (SELECT id FROM ...)"
|
|
// It's still not ideal, it trapped developers many times.
|
|
// And sometimes -1 could be a valid value, like issue ID, negative numbers indicate exclusion.
|
|
// Since db.NoConditionID is for "db" (the package name is db), it makes sense not to use it in the indexer:
|
|
// Why do bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch indexers need to know about db.NoConditionID?
|
|
// So in SearchOptions, we use pointer for fields which could be not specified,
|
|
// and always use the value to filter if it's not nil, even if it's zero or negative.
|
|
// It can handle almost all cases, if there is an exception, we can add a new field, like NoLabelOnly.
|
|
// Unfortunately, we still use db for the indexer and have to convert between db.NoConditionID and nil for legacy reasons.
|
|
type SearchOptions struct {
|
|
Keyword string // keyword to search
|
|
|
|
RepoIDs []int64 // repository IDs which the issues belong to
|
|
AllPublic bool // if include all public repositories
|
|
|
|
IsPull util.OptionalBool // if the issues is a pull request
|
|
IsClosed util.OptionalBool // if the issues is closed
|
|
|
|
IncludedLabelIDs []int64 // labels the issues have
|
|
ExcludedLabelIDs []int64 // labels the issues don't have
|
|
IncludedAnyLabelIDs []int64 // labels the issues have at least one. It will be ignored if IncludedLabelIDs is not empty. It's an uncommon filter, but it has been supported accidentally by issues.IssuesOptions.IncludedLabelNames.
|
|
NoLabelOnly bool // if the issues have no label, if true, IncludedLabelIDs and ExcludedLabelIDs, IncludedAnyLabelIDs will be ignored
|
|
|
|
MilestoneIDs []int64 // milestones the issues have
|
|
|
|
ProjectID *int64 // project the issues belong to
|
|
ProjectBoardID *int64 // project board the issues belong to
|
|
|
|
PosterID *int64 // poster of the issues
|
|
|
|
AssigneeID *int64 // assignee of the issues, zero means no assignee
|
|
|
|
MentionID *int64 // mentioned user of the issues
|
|
|
|
ReviewedID *int64 // reviewer of the issues
|
|
ReviewRequestedID *int64 // requested reviewer of the issues
|
|
|
|
SubscriberID *int64 // subscriber of the issues
|
|
|
|
UpdatedAfterUnix *int64
|
|
UpdatedBeforeUnix *int64
|
|
|
|
db.Paginator
|
|
|
|
SortBy SortBy // sort by field
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Copy returns a copy of the options.
|
|
// Be careful, it's not a deep copy, so `SearchOptions.RepoIDs = {...}` is OK while `SearchOptions.RepoIDs[0] = ...` is not.
|
|
func (o *SearchOptions) Copy(edit ...func(options *SearchOptions)) *SearchOptions {
|
|
if o == nil {
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
v := *o
|
|
for _, e := range edit {
|
|
e(&v)
|
|
}
|
|
return &v
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type SortBy string
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
SortByCreatedDesc SortBy = "-created_unix"
|
|
SortByUpdatedDesc SortBy = "-updated_unix"
|
|
SortByCommentsDesc SortBy = "-comment_count"
|
|
SortByDeadlineDesc SortBy = "-deadline_unix"
|
|
SortByCreatedAsc SortBy = "created_unix"
|
|
SortByUpdatedAsc SortBy = "updated_unix"
|
|
SortByCommentsAsc SortBy = "comment_count"
|
|
SortByDeadlineAsc SortBy = "deadline_unix"
|
|
// Unsupported sort types which are supported by issues.IssuesOptions.SortType:
|
|
//
|
|
// - "priorityrepo":
|
|
// It's impossible to support it in the indexer.
|
|
// It is based on the specified repository in the request, so we cannot add static field to the indexer.
|
|
// If we do something like that query the issues in the specified repository first then append other issues,
|
|
// it will break the pagination.
|
|
//
|
|
// - "project-column-sorting":
|
|
// Although it's possible to support it by adding project.ProjectIssue.Sorting to the indexer,
|
|
// but what if the issue belongs to multiple projects?
|
|
// Since it's unsupported to search issues with keyword in project page, we don't need to support it.
|
|
)
|