Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-11-30 13:56:09 +01:00
Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
oliverpool 4ad42a4e3f [REFACTOR] webhook shared code to prevent import cycles
(cherry picked from commit 04a398a1af)
2024-04-05 19:36:03 +00:00
oliverpool 84eeab59af [REFACTOR] add Icon to webhook.Interface 2024-03-31 07:20:19 +00:00
oliverpool dce754cde1 [REFACTOR] webhook packagist endpoint 2024-03-27 15:38:39 +01:00
oliverpool 8dfbbfef07 [REFACTOR] webhook matrix endpoints 2024-03-27 15:38:38 +01:00
oliverpool 702152bfde [REFACTOR] webhook.Handler interface 2024-03-24 10:35:06 +01:00
oliverpool a47a1e0777 [BUG] Packagist webhook: support all events
Fixes #2329
2024-03-13 09:27:12 +01:00
oliverpool 53f6f62ad4
Store webhook event in database (#29145)
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.

---

1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request

This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.

Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request

So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.

- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)

So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).

Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.

As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go`
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)

(cherry picked from commit 26653b196bd1d15c532af41f60351596dd4330bd)

Conflicts:
	services/webhook/deliver_test.go
	trivial context conflict
2024-03-11 23:36:59 +07:00
Lunny Xiao 16d15ce087
Fix package webhook (#27839)
Fix #23742

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-10-31 04:43:38 +00:00
delvh 0f4e1b9ac6
Restructure webhook module (#22256)
Previously, there was an `import services/webhooks` inside
`modules/notification/webhook`.
This import was removed (after fighting against many import cycles).
Additionally, `modules/notification/webhook` was moved to
`modules/webhook`,
and a few structs/constants were extracted from `models/webhooks` to
`modules/webhook`.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-01 23:23:15 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
Aaron F 3963625b6e
Webhook for Wiki changes (#20219)
Add support for triggering webhook notifications on wiki changes.

This PR contains frontend and backend for webhook notifications on wiki actions (create a new page, rename a page, edit a page and delete a page). The frontend got a new checkbox under the Custom Event -> Repository Events section. There is only one checkbox for create/edit/rename/delete actions, because it makes no sense to separate it and others like releases or packages follow the same schema.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018803-26851196-831f-4fde-9a4c-9e639b0e0d6b.png)

The actions itself are separated, so that different notifications will be executed (with the "action" field). All the webhook receivers implement the new interface method (Wiki) and the corresponding tests.

When implementing this, I encounter a little bug on editing a wiki page. Creating and editing a wiki page is technically the same action and will be handled by the ```updateWikiPage``` function. But the function need to know if it is a new wiki page or just a change. This distinction is done by the ```action``` parameter, but this will not be sent by the frontend (on form submit). This PR will fix this by adding the ```action``` parameter with the values ```_new``` or ```_edit```, which will be used by the ```updateWikiPage``` function.

I've done integration tests with matrix and gitea (http).

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018795-eb5cdc01-9ba3-483e-a6b7-ed0e313a71fb.png)

Fix #16457

Signed-off-by: Aaron Fischer <mail@aaron-fischer.net>
2022-09-04 20:54:23 +01:00
Dr. Tobias Quathamer 3349fd8f79
Add packagist webhook (#18224)
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-01-23 21:46:30 +08:00