Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-11-29 13:16:10 +01:00
Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jason Song 6844258c67
Clarify Actions resources ownership (#31724)
Fix #31707.

Also related to #31715.

Some Actions resources could has different types of ownership. It could
be:

- global: all repos and orgs/users can use it.
- org/user level: only the org/user can use it.
- repo level: only the repo can use it.

There are two ways to distinguish org/user level from repo level:
1. `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1,
repo_id: 0}` for org level.
2. `{owner_id: 0, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1,
repo_id: 0}` for org level.

The first way seems more reasonable, but it may not be true. The point
is that although a resource, like a runner, belongs to a repo (it can be
used by the repo), the runner doesn't belong to the repo's org (other
repos in the same org cannot use the runner). So, the second method
makes more sense.

And the first way is not user-friendly to query, we must set the repo id
to zero to avoid wrong results.

So, #31715 should be right. And the most simple way to fix #31707 is
just:

```diff
-	shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID)
+	shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, 0, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID)
```

However, it is quite intuitive to set both owner id and repo id since
the repo belongs to the owner. So I prefer to be compatible with it. If
we get both owner id and repo id not zero when creating or finding, it's
very clear that the caller want one with repo level, but set owner id
accidentally. So it's OK to accept it but fix the owner id to zero.

(cherry picked from commit a33e74d40d356e8f628ac06a131cb203a3609dec)
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
sillyguodong 561a7cf520
Interpolate runs-on with variables when scheduling tasks (#30640)
Follow #29468
1. Interpolate runs-on with variables when scheduling tasks.
2. The `GetVariablesOfRun` function will check if the `Repo` of the run
is nil.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 2f6b1c46a1a4a90f56ca0f3ad7840e8e70daeab5)

Conflicts:
	services/actions/schedule_tasks.go
	trivial conflict because of 'Add vars context to cron jobs (#3059)'
2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
sillyguodong 16696a42f5
Add API for Variables (#29520)
close #27801

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 62b073e6f31645e446c7e8d6b5a506f61b47924e)

Conflicts:
	- modules/util/util.go
          Trivial resolution, only picking the newly introduced function
	- routers/api/v1/swagger/options.go
          Trivial resolution. We don't have UserBadges, don't pick that part.
	- templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl
          Regenerated.
2024-04-07 10:57:53 +02:00
sillyguodong 6cb9e8d869
Make runs-on support variable expression (#29468)
As title.
Close issue: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/445
Follow: https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/91

Move `getSecretsOfTask` and `getVariablesOfTask` under `models` because
of circular dependency issues.

(cherry picked from commit a1f5dd767729e30d07ab42fda80c19f30a72679f)
2024-03-11 23:36:59 +07:00
Jean-Baptiste Gomond d0f24ff4ca
Added instance-level variables (#28115)
This PR adds instance-level variables, and so closes #27726



![gitea_instance_variables_1](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8344487/ad409cd4-ce36-4c84-a764-34451b0fb63a)

![gitea_instance_variables_2](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8344487/426f0965-dec6-4560-948c-067cdeddd720)

![gitea_instance_variables_3](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8344487/cf1d7776-4938-4825-922e-cbbbf28a5f33)
2023-12-25 07:28:59 +00:00
Lunny Xiao df1e7d0067
Use db.Find instead of writing methods for every object (#28084)
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
2023-11-24 03:49:41 +00:00
sillyguodong 35a653d7ed
Support configuration variables on Gitea Actions (#24724)
Co-Author: @silverwind @wxiaoguang 
Replace: #24404

See:
- [defining configuration variables for multiple
workflows](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows)
- [vars
context](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts#vars-context)

Related to:
- [x] protocol: https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/7
- [x] act_runner: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/157
- [x] act: https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/43

#### Screenshoot
Create Variable:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/236758288-032b7f64-44e7-48ea-b07d-de8b8b0e3729.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/236758174-5203f64c-1d0e-4737-a5b0-62061dee86f8.png)

Workflow:
```yaml
  test_vars:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Print Custom Variables
        run: echo "${{ vars.test_key }}"
      - name: Try to print a non-exist var
        run: echo "${{ vars.NON_EXIST_VAR }}"
```

Actions Log:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/236759075-af0c5950-368d-4758-a8ac-47a96e43b6e2.png)

---
This PR just implement the org / user (depends on the owner of the
current repository) and repo level variables, The Environment level
variables have not been implemented.
Because
[Environment](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/deployment/targeting-different-environments/using-environments-for-deployment#about-environments)
is a module separate from `Actions`. Maybe it would be better to create
a new PR to do it.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-20 22:54:15 +00:00