Backport #26286 by @wxiaoguang
1. Allow leading and trailing spaces by user input, these spaces have
already been trimmed at backend
2. Allow using dots in the topic
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit fcd055c34a)
Backport #25981 by @asdil12
After RPM is supported with https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23380
let's show the user
how to add the repo and install the RPM via all common package managers.
Co-authored-by: Dominik Heidler <dominik@heidler.eu>
(cherry picked from commit dfd371a363)
Backport #25417 by @wxiaoguang
Update WorkPath/WORK_PATH related documents, remove out-dated
information.
Remove "StaticRootPath" on the admin config display page, because few
end user really need it, it only causes misconfiguration.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ee47face12)
- Resolves#476
- Follow up for: #540
- Ensure that the doer and blocked person cannot follow each other.
- Ensure that the block person cannot watch doer's repositories.
- Add unblock button to the blocked user list.
- Add blocked since information to the blocked user list.
- Add extra testing to moderation code.
- Blocked user will unwatch doer's owned repository upon blocking.
- Add flash messages to let the user know the block/unblock action was successful.
- Add "You haven't blocked any users" message.
- Add organization blocking a user.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/802
(cherry picked from commit 0505a10421)
(cherry picked from commit 37b4e6ef9b)
(cherry picked from commit 217475385a)
(cherry picked from commit f2c38ce5c2)
(cherry picked from commit 1edfb68137)
(cherry picked from commit 2cbc12dc74)
(cherry picked from commit 79ff020f18)
- Add the ability to block a user via their profile page.
- This will unstar their repositories and visa versa.
- Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations).
- Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests.
- Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments.
- Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540
(cherry picked from commit 687d852480)
(cherry picked from commit 0c32a4fde5)
(cherry picked from commit 1791130e3c)
(cherry picked from commit 00f411819f)
(cherry picked from commit e0c039b0e8)
(cherry picked from commit b5a058ef00)
(cherry picked from commit 5ff5460d28)
(cherry picked from commit 97bc6e619d)
- Resolves#323
- Adjust the description of the update check function on the
installation page to describe the privacy method instead of the HTTP
method by checking gitea.io
(cherry picked from commit 61eae5b105)
(cherry picked from commit 8fdb43615c)
Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1016
options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
(cherry picked from commit 8c12b08718)
Backport #25894 by @sebastian-sauer
Use a real button and add an aria-label.
Additionally, show the button whenever it is focused.
See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/998 for explanation.
Our handling of this button is now equal to that of GitHub.
Nothing has changed visually.
Co-authored-by: sebastian-sauer <sauer.sebastian@gmail.com>
Backport #25648
Replace #25580Fix#19453
The problem was: when users set "GITEA__XXX__YYY" , the "install page"
doesn't respect it.
So, to make the result consistent and avoid surprising end users, now
the "install page" also writes the environment variables to the config
file.
And, to make things clear, there are enough messages on the UI to tell
users what will happen.
There are some necessary/related changes to `environment-to-ini.go`:
* The "--clear" flag is removed and it was incorrectly written there.
The "clear" operation should be done if INSTALL_LOCK=true
* The "--prefix" flag is removed because it's never used, never
documented and it only causes inconsistent behavior.
The only conflict during backport is "ui divider" in
templates/install.tmpl
Some translations were just copied&pasted and they duplicated a lot.
Now, they are broken .....
To avoid blocking 1.20 release, as a quick fix, remove all of them, only
keep the en-US texts.
Backport #25109 by @jtran
The current UI to create API access tokens uses checkboxes that have a
complicated relationship where some need to be checked and/or disabled
in certain states. It also requires that a user interact with it to
understand what their options really are.
This branch changes to use `<select>`s. It better fits the available
options, and it's closer to [GitHub's
UI](https://github.com/settings/personal-access-tokens/new), which is
good, in my opinion. It's more mobile friendly since the tap-areas are
larger. If we ever add more permissions, like Maintainer, there's a
natural place that doesn't take up more screen real-estate.
This branch also fixes a few minor issues:
- Hide the error about selecting at least one permission after second
submission
- Fix help description to call it "authorization" since that's what
permissions are about (not authentication)
Related: #24767.
<img width="883" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-07 at 5 07 34 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/10803/6b63d807-c9be-4a4b-8e53-ecab6cbb8f76">
---
When it's open:
<img width="881" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-07 at 5 07 59 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/10803/2432c6d0-39c2-4ca4-820e-c878ffdbfb69">
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes#24501Closes#24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Before, Gitea shows the database table stats on the `admin dashboard`
page.
It has some problems:
* `count(*)` is quite heavy. If tables have many records, this blocks
loading the admin page blocks for a long time
* Some users had even reported issues that they can't visit their admin
page because this page causes blocking or `50x error (reverse proxy
timeout)`
* The `actions` stat is not useful. The table is simply too large. Does
it really matter if it contains 1,000,000 rows or 9,999,999 rows?
* The translation `admin.dashboard.statistic_info` is difficult to
maintain.
So, this PR uses a separate page to show the stats and removes the
`actions` stat.
## ⚠️ BREAKING
The `actions` Prometheus metrics collector has been removed for the
reasons mentioned beforehand.
Please do not rely on its output anymore.
The admin config page has been broken for many many times, a little
refactoring would make this page panic.
So, add a test for it, and add another test to cover the 500 error page.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves#2175.
## Screenshots
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321
Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.
Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.
After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
Very small UX change, "confusable" is a word that is indeed valid, but
when you look it up online, it doesn't take long for this adjective to
appear in [its technical Unicode-related
context](https://util.unicode.org/UnicodeJsps/confusables.jsp). I think
that it throws me off as a person that doesn't speak English natively.
I think that this could be replaced with "can be confused with". As the
change is very small and purely a matter of preference, if you (the
maintainer) believe that this shouldn't be included, feel free to close
this without any further discussion, as your time would probably be
better used elsewhere.
