Simplify code and use `.files` elements
(cherry picked from commit ca297a90fb1fec5b270fad1a3e575916510e7385)
Conflicts:
web_src/js/features/repo-legacy.js
(cherry picked from commit c1ac3e5891)
Backport #30175 by @jmlt2002
- Inline math blocks couldn't be preceeded or succeeded by
alphanumerical characters due to changes introduced in PR #21171.
Removed the condition that caused this (precedingCharacter condition)
and added a new exit condition of the for-loop that checks if a specific
'$' was escaped using '\' so that the math expression can be rendered as
intended.
- Additionally this PR fixes another bug where math blocks of the type
'$xyz$abc$' where the dollar sign was not escaped by the user, generated
an error (shown in the screenshots below)
- Altered the tests to accomodate for the changes
Former behaviour (from try.gitea.io):
Fixed behaviour (from my local build):
(Edit) Source code for the README.md file:
```
$x$ -$x$ $x$-
a$xa$ $xa$a 1$xb$ $xb$1
$a a$b b$
a$b $a a$b b$
$a a\$b b$
```
Signed-off-by: João Tiago <joao.leal.tintas@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: João Tiago <114936010+jmlt2002@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit ac65aeecbd42ed30cc0838b3fad12b58daadf3ad)
Fixes#30235
If the key id "front" byte has a single digit, `%X` is missing the 0
prefix.
` 38D1A3EADDBEA9C` instead of
`038D1A3EADDBEA9C`
When using the `IssuerFingerprint` slice `%X` is enough but I changed it
to `%016X` too to be consistent.
(cherry picked from commit eb505b128c7b9b2459f2a5d20b5740017125178b)
Conflicts:
- models/asymkey/gpg_key_commit_verification.go
Ported the change to models/asymkey/gpg_key_object_verification.go
(cherry picked from commit 63904e2f97)
Backport #30238 by @silverwind
Create a new `issue-navbar` class specifically for this bar, previous
class used in many places and I thought I had them all removed, but not
this one.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30226
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 39322d9fc4644d2ede3efe3a9c4efee2e493d4cd)
Backport #30215 by @silverwind
On the labels list, This `left` class caused the dropdown content to
flash on page load until JS had hidden it. Remove it as I see no purpose
to it.
<img width="215" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/9e1de97f-dd89-41e0-9229-5c4a786ba762">
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3ff4a6936b5ee05b3df945c466285de47ea87ef2)
Backport #30193 by @KN4CK3R
Fixes#30189
Can't verify subkeys if they are not loaded.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
(cherry picked from commit e581efe238d1f735787b5dbdfcce9a1d73384ef3)
Backport #30195 by @silverwind
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30185, regression from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30162.
The checkboxes were unclickable because the label was positioned over
the checkbox with `padding`. Now it uses `margin` so the checkbox itself
will be clickable in all cases.
Secondly, I changed the for/id linking to also add missing `for`
attributes when `id` is present. The other way around (only `for`
present) is currently not handled and I think there are likey no
occurences in the code and introducing new non-generated `id`s might
cause problems elsewhere if we do, so I skipped on that.
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 9d38c4d60ef5bd015e1430386e38d9f32e050f8f)
1. Distinguish inline an block code with new CSS variable
`--color-markup-code-inline`
2. Various color tweaks, better contrast from background
(cherry picked from commit 662eb4b0852f9ce2c161e7fea5ac66bf912fc9f6)
---
- Revert the changes of #2874.
- Add more contrast to the inline block for light and dark theme.
(cherry picked from commit 662eb4b0852f9ce2c161e7fea5ac66bf912fc9f6)
(cherry picked from commit ff1744cbbc)
- Adjust the warning and success text to be more representive (make them
more green and yellow). They still confirm to AAA contrast.
- For important, note and caution callout boxes make use of the light
variants for the colors colors rather than the dark variant.
- Resolves#3084
(cherry picked from commit 515ccaacd9)
- Fix the layout of admin pages, it previously was full-width and had
the alert at the incorrect place and within an container.
- Make the placement of the alert consistent with other pages, inside
`flex-container-main` and not wrapped around a container.
- We have to revert 145bebc829, as this
expected that the page contain provided padding, this was provided by
the incorrect placement of the alert. As well isn't consistent with how
other pages are being shown, non-full width. The solution to the
described problem isn't optimal and should rather be fixed with the tables.
- Reverts 145bebc829
- Resolves#3082
(cherry picked from commit c2d0f64340)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3046
This PR fixes an issue in the diff compare view, where when working on a fork that has not the same name as the upstream repo, the "View file" button links to a wrong, often missing, location.
Demonstration of this issue:
- Visit https://next.forgejo.org/mai-lapyst-test-org/upstream/compare/main...Mai-Lapyst/downstream:mai-lapyst-patch-1.
- Click the "View file" button of the patch.
- Get taken to `4fe947d522/README.md` (which does not exist and returns a 404) instead of `4fe947d522/README.md`. Note the different repository name (`upstream` vs `downstream`).
Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3077
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1518
An attempt at adding an optional pronoun field for user profiles, as suggested here 3 years ago: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/13990
I made this for [my own instance](https://git.gay/h) and didn't initially think I'd make a PR because of the previous closed issue, but I thought I'd ask the Forgejo matrix chat to see if there was any support and there was!
I'm told I should make a database migration, some help as to how to do that would be appreciated.
Co-authored-by: hazycora <hazysu@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3076
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
