mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo
synced 2024-11-25 03:06:10 +01:00
16 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gusted
|
2da33aae2d
|
[MODERATION] User blocking
- Add the ability to block a user via their profile page. - This will unstar their repositories and visa versa. - Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations). - Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests. - Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments. - Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540 (cherry picked from commit |
||
|
Gusted
|
006291bd9c
|
[MODERATION] Purge issues on user deletion
- Forgejo has the option to delete users, in which all data except issues and comments are removed, this makes sense in some cases where users need to be removed cleanly but without removing their existing bug reports or comments to an discussion. In the case of spammers, admins have the option to enable purging, where comments are removed. - Add issues to the list of things to be removed if purge is checked. - No unit testing, as this gigantic function doesn't have one to begin with. - Add integration test. - Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1268 (cherry picked from commit |
||
|
Earl Warren
|
c7a389f2b2
|
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit |
||
|
Kyle D
|
33439b733a
|
Disable query token param in integration tests (#28592)
Follow up to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28484, this PR enables the setting for integration tests and migrates a few additional test queries. |
||
|
KN4CK3R
|
838db2f891
|
Convert to url auth to header auth in tests (#28484)
Related #28390 |
||
|
Nanguan Lin
|
2f8e1604f8
|
Fix review request number and add more tests (#27104)
fix #27019 ## testfixture yml 1. add issue20(a pr issue) in repo 23, org 17 2. add user15 to team 9 3. add four reviews about issue20 ## test case add two tests that are described with code comments the code before pr #26784 failed the first test <img width="479" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/1d9b5787-11b4-4c4d-931f-6a9869547f35"> current code failed the second test(as mentioned in #27019) <img width="484" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/05608055-7587-43d1-bae1-92c688270819"> Any advice is appreciated. --------- Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> |
||
|
Nanguan Lin
|
da50be7360
|
Replace 'userxx' with 'orgxx' in all test files when the user type is org (#27052)
Currently 'userxx' and 'orgxx' are both used as username in test files when the user type is org, which is confusing. This PR replaces all 'userxx' with 'orgxx' when the user type is org(`user.type==1`). Some non-trivial changes 1. Rename `user3` dir to `org3` in `tests/git-repositories-meta` 2. Change `end` in `issue reference` because 'org3' is one char shorter than 'user3'  3. Change the search result number of `user/repo2` because `user3/repo21` can't be searched now  4. Change the first org name getting from API because the result is ordered by alphabet asc and now `org 17` is before `org25`   Other modifications are just find all and replace all. Unit tests with SQLite are all passed. --------- Co-authored-by: caicandong <1290147055@qq.com> |
||
|
wxiaoguang
|
f01bed2443
|
Avoid double-unescaping of form value (#26853)
1. The old `prepareQueryArg` did double-unescaping of form value. 2. By the way, remove the unnecessary `ctx.Flash = ...` in `MockContext`. Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> |
||
|
sebastian-sauer
|
55532061c8
|
Add commits dropdown in PR files view and allow commit by commit review (#25528)
This PR adds a new dropdown to select a commit or a commit range (shift-click like github) of a Pull Request. After selection of a commit only the changes of this commit will be shown. When selecting a range of commits the diff of this range is shown. This allows to review a PR commit by commit or by viewing only commit ranges. The "Show changes since your last review" mechanism github uses is implemented, too. When reviewing a single commit or a commit range the "Viewed" functionality is disabled. ## Screenshots ### The commit dropdown  ### Selecting a commit range  ### Show changes of a single commit only  ### Show changes of a commit range  Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20989 Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/19263 --------- Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io> Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> |
||
|
Lunny Xiao
|
315124b469
|
Fix parallelly generating index failure with Mysql (#24567) | ||
|
Jack Hay
|
18de83b2a3
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
||
|
Brecht Van Lommel
|
6221a6fd54
|
Scoped labels (#22585)
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> |
||
|
Chongyi Zheng
|
de484e86bc
|
Support scoped access tokens (#20908)
This PR adds the support for scopes of access tokens, mimicking the design of GitHub OAuth scopes. The changes of the core logic are in `models/auth` that `AccessToken` struct will have a `Scope` field. The normalized (no duplication of scope), comma-separated scope string will be stored in `access_token` table in the database. In `services/auth`, the scope will be stored in context, which will be used by `reqToken` middleware in API calls. Only OAuth2 tokens will have granular token scopes, while others like BasicAuth will default to scope `all`. A large amount of work happens in `routers/api/v1/api.go` and the corresponding `tests/integration` tests, that is adding necessary scopes to each of the API calls as they fit. - [x] Add `Scope` field to `AccessToken` - [x] Add access control to all API endpoints - [x] Update frontend & backend for when creating tokens - [x] Add a database migration for `scope` column (enable 'all' access to past tokens) I'm aiming to complete it before Gitea 1.19 release. Fixes #4300 |
||
|
Lunny Xiao
|
df676a47d0
|
Remove session in api tests (#21984)
It's no meaning to request an API route with session. |
||
|
flynnnnnnnnnn
|
e81ccc406b
|
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification. Fix #16132 Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github> Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com> |
||
|
Kyle D
|
c8ded77680
|
Kd/ci playwright go test (#20123)
* Add initial playwright config * Simplify Makefile * Simplify Makefile * Use correct config files * Update playwright settings * Fix package-lock file * Don't use test logger for e2e tests * fix frontend lint * Allow passing TEST_LOGGER variable * Init postgres database * use standard gitea env variables * Update playwright * update drone * Move empty env var to commands * Cleanup * Move integrations to subfolder * tests integrations to tests integraton * Run e2e tests with go test * Fix linting * install CI deps * Add files to ESlint * Fix drone typo * Don't log to console in CI * Use go test http server * Add build step before tests * Move shared init function to common package * fix drone * Clean up tests * Fix linting * Better mocking for page + version string * Cleanup test generation * Remove dependency on gitea binary * Fix linting * add initial support for running specific tests * Add ACCEPT_VISUAL variable * don't require git-lfs * Add initial documentation * Review feedback * Add logged in session test * Attempt fixing drone race * Cleanup and bump version * Bump deps * Review feedback * simplify installation * Fix ci * Update install docs |
Renamed from integrations/api_issue_test.go (Browse further)