Backport #24925, partially backport #24934
(`docs/content/doc/help/faq.zh-cn.md` file)
Part of backport has already done by #24942
Also backport #24881 to avoid "deadlock"
---------
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Attempt clarify the AppWorkPath in the documentation by using different
notation and adding a section to the start of the cheat sheet.
Fix#21523
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* docs: update the ROOT documentation and error messages
* The documentation now reflects what happens in the
setting/repository.go::newRepository function:
filepath.Join(AppWorkPath, RepoRootPath) was missing.
* The error message displayed when RepoRootPath is not found now
displays the value of RepoRootPath. Given the complexity of the
construction of this value, only referring to it in the abstract
is likely to be misleading to the Gitea admin trying to interpret
the message.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Add a new default theme `auto`, which will automatically switch between
`gitea` (light) and `arc-green` (dark) themes depending on the user's
operating system settings.
Closes: #8183
Gitea allows to whitelist email domains so that only email addresses from certain domains are allowed to register an account, but does not currently allows to do the opposite: blacklisting email domains so that addresses from certain domains are *forbidden* to register an account.
The idea has been briefly mentioned in the discussion about issue #6350, but never implemented. This PR does that.
The rationale is that, in my experience of running a Gitea instance, *a single email domain* is responsible for *most* of the spam accounts, and for *all* of the spam accounts that manage to get past the email confirmation step. So on top of the other spam mitigation measures already available (email confirmation, CAPTCHA, etc.), having the option to block a particularly annoying domain would be helpful.
close#13628
* Store repository data in data path if not previously set
* update docs
* Update docs/content/doc/advanced/config-cheat-sheet.en-us.md
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
* update docs
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
It's causing browser errors logged in Firefox under certain
circumstances, and I think we're better off recommending Linux users to
install a proper emoji font into their system.
* fixed and updated FAQ table of contents links, rewording one heading that wouldn't generate a working link
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Restricted users (#4334): initial implementation
* Add User.IsRestricted & UI to edit it
* Pass user object instead of user id to places where IsRestricted flag matters
* Restricted users: maintain access rows for all referenced repos (incl public)
* Take logged in user & IsRestricted flag into account in org/repo listings, searches and accesses
* Add basic repo access tests for restricted users
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Mention restricted users in the faq
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Revert unnecessary change `.isUserPartOfOrg` -> `.IsUserPartOfOrg`
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Remove unnecessary `org.IsOrganization()` call
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Revert to an `int64` keyed `accessMap`
* Add type `userAccess`
* Add convenience func updateUserAccess()
* Turn accessMap into a `map[int64]userAccess`
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* or even better: `map[int64]*userAccess`
* updateUserAccess(): use tighter syntax as suggested by lafriks
* even tighter
* Avoid extra loop
* Don't disclose limited orgs to unauthenticated users
* Don't assume block only applies to orgs
* Use an array of `VisibleType` for filtering
* fix yet another thinko
* Ok - no need for u
* Revert "Ok - no need for u"
This reverts commit 5c3e886aab.
Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
