Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-11-24 02:36:10 +01:00
Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
TheFox0x7 4de909747b Add testifylint to lint checks (#4535)
go-require lint is ignored for now

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4535
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
2024-07-30 19:41:10 +00:00
oliverpool 702152bfde [REFACTOR] webhook.Handler interface 2024-03-24 10:35:06 +01:00
oliverpool 53f6f62ad4
Store webhook event in database (#29145)
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.

---

1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request

This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.

Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request

So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.

- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)

So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).

Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.

As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go`
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)

(cherry picked from commit 26653b196bd1d15c532af41f60351596dd4330bd)

Conflicts:
	services/webhook/deliver_test.go
	trivial context conflict
2024-03-11 23:36:59 +07:00
KN4CK3R 58f5fa6536
Fix Matrix and MSTeams nil dereference (#28089)
Fixes #28088 
Fixes #28094

Added missing tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-11-17 12:17:33 +01:00
谈笑风生间 5104c887d3
Modify the content format of the Feishu webhook (#25106)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24368

## what my pull request does

Since the official documentation states that custom bots do not support
hyperlink functionality, simply adding it without making some formatting
changes would result in an unappealing output. Therefore, I have
modified the formatting of the output. Currently, it is only used for
Feishu.

--- 


[docs](https://open.feishu.cn/document/uAjLw4CM/ukTMukTMukTM/im-v1/message/create_json#%E8%B6%85%E9%93%BE%E6%8E%A5%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%AF%B4%E6%98%8E)

<img width="641" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/360e1c81-ab64-4ef6-851e-aa450d6e85a4">

- Issue

<img width="423" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/519f6fae-81ab-4ec8-89b8-f6a73ff93783">


- Issue Comment


<img width="548" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/749c0d1c-3657-431e-b787-8bf4c23cce83">


- Assign

<img width="431" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/066f99e5-eabb-455d-91fb-a8359cc26dc7">

<img width="457" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/c6c10f99-db83-46ef-a775-4c91979fa68f">

- Merge

<img width="408" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/e627bf43-5954-45aa-acf6-261ee046802f">

- PullRequest

<img width="425" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/72cfa714-d3fa-4fb9-abdd-e8508d756056">
2023-08-24 09:00:11 +08:00
delvh 0f4e1b9ac6
Restructure webhook module (#22256)
Previously, there was an `import services/webhooks` inside
`modules/notification/webhook`.
This import was removed (after fighting against many import cycles).
Additionally, `modules/notification/webhook` was moved to
`modules/webhook`,
and a few structs/constants were extracted from `models/webhooks` to
`modules/webhook`.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-01 23:23:15 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
Aaron F 3963625b6e
Webhook for Wiki changes (#20219)
Add support for triggering webhook notifications on wiki changes.

This PR contains frontend and backend for webhook notifications on wiki actions (create a new page, rename a page, edit a page and delete a page). The frontend got a new checkbox under the Custom Event -> Repository Events section. There is only one checkbox for create/edit/rename/delete actions, because it makes no sense to separate it and others like releases or packages follow the same schema.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018803-26851196-831f-4fde-9a4c-9e639b0e0d6b.png)

The actions itself are separated, so that different notifications will be executed (with the "action" field). All the webhook receivers implement the new interface method (Wiki) and the corresponding tests.

When implementing this, I encounter a little bug on editing a wiki page. Creating and editing a wiki page is technically the same action and will be handled by the ```updateWikiPage``` function. But the function need to know if it is a new wiki page or just a change. This distinction is done by the ```action``` parameter, but this will not be sent by the frontend (on form submit). This PR will fix this by adding the ```action``` parameter with the values ```_new``` or ```_edit```, which will be used by the ```updateWikiPage``` function.

I've done integration tests with matrix and gitea (http).

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018795-eb5cdc01-9ba3-483e-a6b7-ed0e313a71fb.png)

Fix #16457

Signed-off-by: Aaron Fischer <mail@aaron-fischer.net>
2022-09-04 20:54:23 +01:00
Lunny Xiao 33fca2b537
Move webhook into models/webhook/ (#17579) 2021-11-10 13:13:16 +08:00
KN4CK3R 4fcae3d06d
Add tests for all webhooks (#16214)
* Added tests for MS Teams.

* Added tests for Dingtalk.

* Added tests for Telegram.

* Added tests for Feishu.

* Added tests for Discord.

* Added tests for closed issue and pullrequest comment.

* Added tests for Matrix.

* Trim all spaces.

* Added tests for Slack.

* Added JSONPayload tests.

* Added general tests.

* Replaced duplicated code.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2021-06-20 22:12:19 -04:00