Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-12-13 15:01:58 +01:00
Commit graph

142 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Giteabot
64a418dfc7
Fix issue templates when blank isses are disabled (#27061) (#27082)
Backport #27061 by @JakobDev

Fixes #27060

Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
(cherry picked from commit b139234fa8)
2023-09-20 12:50:46 +02:00
Giteabot
1689b3da55
Redirect from {repo}/issues/new to {repo}/issues/new/choose when blank issues are disabled (#26813) (#26847)
Backport #26813 by @JakobDev

You can currently visit `{repo}/issues/new` and create a blank issue,
even if it's disabled. This PR fixes this,

Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1356

Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
(cherry picked from commit 2cfabb68ff)
2023-09-08 08:09:18 +02:00
Giteabot
ef46b01168
Fix unable to display individual-level project (#26198) (#26636)
Backport #26198 by @CaiCandong

As title

Before:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50507092/94afc3bf-5597-4151-a59b-5632840ffa21)

After:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50507092/df81aa0b-98a6-477d-a270-2e45b3dca0fc)

fix #26189

Co-authored-by: caicandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 352a495c02)
2023-09-08 08:07:19 +02:00
a1012112796
5abca17b64
fix reopen logic for agit flow pull request (#26399) (#26613)
Backport #26399

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit f43df2f820)
2023-09-08 08:07:19 +02:00
Giteabot
884f2c125c
Fix the route for pull-request's authors (#26016) (#26018)
Backport #26016 by @wxiaoguang

Close #25906

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/e689f3e1-9a90-46c0-89f4-2d61394d34d3)

Succeeded logs:

```
[I] router: completed GET /root/test/issues/posters?&q=%20&_=1689853025011 for [::1]:59271, 200 OK in 127.7ms @ repo/issue.go:3505(repo.IssuePosters)

[I] router: completed GET /root/test/pulls/posters?&q=%20&_=1689853968204 for [::1]:59269, 200 OK in 94.3ms @ repo/issue.go:3509(repo.PullPosters)
```

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 54a516e9da)
2023-07-24 07:59:10 +02:00
Giteabot
27a40aeb6b
Avoid opening/closing PRs which are already merged (#25883) (#25903)
Backport #25883 by @yp05327

We can select PRs to open/close them by one click, but we forgot to
check whether it is merged.
You can get an opening merged PR:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/22c2e747-4bb9-4742-a9aa-ef39d5308bc5)

You can confirm this in:
https://try.gitea.io/yp05327/testrepo/pulls/5

Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9159964ada)
2023-07-24 07:58:56 +02:00
Gusted
dc9499bdf9
[MODERATION] user blocking
- Add the ability to block a user via their profile page.
- This will unstar their repositories and visa versa.
- Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations).
- Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests.
- Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments.
- Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540
(cherry picked from commit 687d852480)
(cherry picked from commit 0c32a4fde5)
(cherry picked from commit 1791130e3c)
(cherry picked from commit 00f411819f)
(cherry picked from commit e0c039b0e8)
(cherry picked from commit b5a058ef00)
(cherry picked from commit 5ff5460d28)
(cherry picked from commit 97bc6e619d)
2023-07-17 00:26:42 +02:00
Giteabot
2b79d3fd52
For API attachments, use API URL (#25639) (#25814)
Backport #25639 by @lunny

Fix #25257

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-10 12:56:16 +00:00
Giteabot
03cacf971e
Check ctx.Written() for GetActionIssue (#25698) (#25711)
Backport #25698 by @wolfogre

Fix #25697.

Just avoid panic, maybe there's another bug to trigger this case.

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +02:00
silverwind
24e64fe372
Replace interface{} with any (#25686) (#25687)
Same perl replacement as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25686
but for 1.20 to ease future backporting.
2023-07-04 23:41:32 -04:00
Giteabot
9bbb4d8d6d
Improve loadprojects for issue list (#25468) (#25493) 2023-06-26 02:06:58 +00:00
Giteabot
1cc63ade82
Fix MilestoneIDs when querying issues (#25125) (#25141)
Backport #25125 by @Zettat123

Fix #25114

Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
2023-06-08 11:03:53 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
f9cfd6ce5b
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634)
This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.

Fix #15367
Replaces #23070 
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.

We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.

Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.

> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
> 
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
> 
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
> 
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
> 
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-26 01:04:48 +00:00
JakobDev
aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues (#24406)
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.

## Screenshots

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)

The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.

## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.

## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration

**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests (#24481)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321

Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.

Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.

After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
wxiaoguang
4647660776
Rewrite logger system (#24726)
## ⚠️ Breaking

The `log.<mode>.<logger>` style config has been dropped. If you used it,
please check the new config manual & app.example.ini to make your
instance output logs as expected.

Although many legacy options still work, it's encouraged to upgrade to
the new options.

The SMTP logger is deleted because SMTP is not suitable to collect logs.

If you have manually configured Gitea log options, please confirm the
logger system works as expected after upgrading.

## Description

Close #12082 and maybe more log-related issues, resolve some related
FIXMEs in old code (which seems unfixable before)

Just like rewriting queue #24505 : make code maintainable, clear legacy
bugs, and add the ability to support more writers (eg: JSON, structured
log)

There is a new document (with examples): `logging-config.en-us.md`

This PR is safer than the queue rewriting, because it's just for
logging, it won't break other logic.

## The old problems

The logging system is quite old and difficult to maintain:
* Unclear concepts: Logger, NamedLogger, MultiChannelledLogger,
SubLogger, EventLogger, WriterLogger etc
* Some code is diffuclt to konw whether it is right:
`log.DelNamedLogger("console")` vs `log.DelNamedLogger(log.DEFAULT)` vs
`log.DelLogger("console")`
* The old system heavily depends on ini config system, it's difficult to
create new logger for different purpose, and it's very fragile.
* The "color" trick is difficult to use and read, many colors are
unnecessary, and in the future structured log could help
* It's difficult to add other log formats, eg: JSON format
* The log outputer doesn't have full control of its goroutine, it's
difficult to make outputer have advanced behaviors
* The logs could be lost in some cases: eg: no Fatal error when using
CLI.
* Config options are passed by JSON, which is quite fragile.
* INI package makes the KEY in `[log]` section visible in `[log.sub1]`
and `[log.sub1.subA]`, this behavior is quite fragile and would cause
more unclear problems, and there is no strong requirement to support
`log.<mode>.<logger>` syntax.


## The new design

See `logger.go` for documents.


## Screenshot

<details>


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/4462d713-ba39-41f5-bb08-de912e67e1ff)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/b188035e-f691-428b-8b2d-ff7b2199b2f9)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/132e9745-1c3b-4e00-9e0d-15eaea495dee)

</details>

## TODO

* [x] add some new tests
* [x] fix some tests
* [x] test some sub-commands (manually ....)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-21 22:35:11 +00:00
wxiaoguang
6b33152b7d
Decouple the different contexts from each other (#24786)
Replace #16455

Close #21803

Mixing different Gitea contexts together causes some problems:

1. Unable to respond proper content when error occurs, eg: Web should
respond HTML while API should respond JSON
2. Unclear dependency, eg: it's unclear when Context is used in
APIContext, which fields should be initialized, which methods are
necessary.


To make things clear, this PR introduces a Base context, it only
provides basic Req/Resp/Data features.

This PR mainly moves code. There are still many legacy problems and
TODOs in code, leave unrelated changes to future PRs.
2023-05-21 09:50:53 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
38cf43d060
Some refactors for issues stats (#24793)
This PR

- [x] Move some functions from `issues.go` to `issue_stats.go` and
`issue_label.go`
- [x] Remove duplicated issue options `UserIssueStatsOption` to keep
only one `IssuesOptions`
2023-05-19 22:17:48 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
09ab64dfad
Remove duplicated issues options and some more refactors (#24787)
This PR 

- [x] Move some code from `issue.go` to `issue_search.go` and
`issue_update.go`
- [x] Use `IssuesOptions` instead of `IssueStatsOptions` becuase they
are too similiar.
- [x] Rename some functions
2023-05-18 10:45:25 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
b807d2f620
Support no label/assignee filter and batch clearing labels/assignees (#24707)
Since milestones has been implemented, this PR will fix #3407

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-05-17 17:21:35 +08:00
wxiaoguang
def4956122
Improve Gitea's web context, decouple "issue template" code into service package (#24590)
1. Remove unused fields/methods in web context.
2. Make callers call target function directly instead of the light
wrapper like "IsUserRepoReaderSpecific"
3. The "issue template" code shouldn't be put in the "modules/context"
package, so move them to the service package.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-09 01:30:14 +02:00
sillyguodong
e962ade99c
Refresh the refernce of the closed PR when reopening (#24231)
Close #24213 
Replace #23830

#### Cause

- Before, in order to making PR can get latest commit after reopening,
the `ref`(${REPO_PATH}/refs/pull/${PR_INDEX}/head) of evrey closed PR
will be updated when pushing commits to the `head branch` of the closed
PR.

#### Changes

- For closed PR , won't perform these behavior: insert`comment`, push
`notification` (UI and email), exectue
[pushToBaseRepo](7422503341/services/pull/pull.go (L409))
function and trigger `action` any more when pushing to the `head branch`
of the closed PR.
- Refresh the reference of the PR when reopening the closed PR (**even
if the head branch has been deleted before**). Make the reference of PR
consistent with the `head branch`.
2023-05-08 14:39:32 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
3f0651d4d6
Improve milestone filter on issues page (#22423)
Now we have `All milestones`, `No milestones`, `Open milestones` and
`Closed milestones`.
Fix #11924
Fix #22411 

<img width="1166" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/212243375-95eea035-a972-44b8-8088-53db614cb07e.png">
2023-04-30 09:12:49 -04:00
sillyguodong
8f57aa014b
Alert error message if open dependencies are included in the issues that try to batch close (#24329)
fix #24185 

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-04-26 12:54:17 -04:00
wxiaoguang
13d1d2764c
Show commit history for closed/merged PRs (#24238)
Close #24237

Before:

<details>


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/233424875-a69c6dad-df4a-483e-b796-36c6459af2d6.png)

</details>

After:


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/233424712-60a296de-017b-49a8-89b2-5925ff452646.png)

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-21 12:36:37 -04:00
wxiaoguang
de2268ffab
Fix issue attachment handling (#24202)
Close #24195

Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
f07b0de997
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)


The bug is:

1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview


This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-20 02:39:44 -04:00
wxiaoguang
cfe3d6e9b5
Make more functions use ctx instead of db.DefaultContext (#24068)
Continue the "ctx refactoring" work.

There are still a lot db.DefaultContext, incorrect context could cause
database deadlock errors.
2023-04-14 14:18:28 -04:00
Lunny Xiao
b918a2c4fb
Fix redirect bug when creating issue from a project (#23971)
Fix #23966
2023-04-08 16:17:50 +08:00
Hester Gong
6eb678374b
Refactor authors dropdown (send get request from frontend to avoid long wait time) (#23890)
Right now the authors search dropdown might take a long time to load if
amount of authors is huge.
Example: (In the video below, there are about 10000 authors, and it
takes about 10 seconds to open the author dropdown)

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/229422229-98aa9656-3439-4f8c-9f4e-83bd8e2a2557.mov

Possible improvements can be made, which will take 2 steps (Thanks to
@wolfogre for advice):

Step 1:
Backend: Add a new api, which returns a limit of 30 posters with matched
prefix.
Frontend: Change the search behavior from frontend search(fomantic
search) to backend search(when input is changed, send a request to get
authors matching the current search prefix)

Step 2:
Backend: Optimize the api in step 1 using indexer to support fuzzy
search.

This PR is implements the first step. The main changes:
1. Added api: `GET /{type:issues|pulls}/posters` , which return a limit
of 30 users with matched prefix (prefix sent as query). If
`DEFAULT_SHOW_FULL_NAME` in `custom/conf/app.ini` is set to true, will
also include fullnames fuzzy search.
2. Added a tooltip saying "Shows a maximum of 30 users" to the author
search dropdown
3. Change the search behavior from frontend search to backend search

After:

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/229430960-f88fafd8-fd5d-4f84-9df2-2677539d5d08.mov

Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22586

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-04-07 08:11:02 +08:00
wxiaoguang
5cc0801de9
Introduce GitHub markdown editor, keep EasyMDE as fallback (#23876)
The first step of the plan

* #23290

Thanks to @silverwind for the first try in #15394 . Close #10729 and a
lot of related issues.

The EasyMDE is not removed, now it works as a fallback, users can switch
between these two editors.

Editor list:

* Issue / PR comment
* Issue / PR comment edit
* Issue / PR comment quote reply
* PR diff view, inline comment
* PR diff view, inline comment edit
* PR diff view, inline comment quote reply
* Release editor
* Wiki editor

Some editors have attached dropzone

Screenshots:

<details>


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/229363558-7e44dcd4-fb6d-48a0-92f8-bd12f57bb0a0.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/229363566-781489c8-5306-4347-9714-d71af5d5b0b1.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/229363771-1717bf5c-0f2a-4fc2-ba84-4f5b2a343a11.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/229363793-ad362d0f-a045-47bd-8f9d-05a9a842bb39.png)

</details>

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-04-03 18:06:57 +08:00
JakobDev
f384b13f1c
Implement Issue Config (#20956)
Closes #20955

This PR adds the possibility to disable blank Issues, when the Repo has
templates. This can be done by creating the file
`.gitea/issue_config.yaml` with the content `blank_issues_enabled` in
the Repo.
2023-03-28 14:22:07 -04:00
qwerty287
3cab9c6b0c
Add API to manage issue dependencies (#17935)
Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are
blocked by this issue
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an
issue's dependencies
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new
issue dependencies
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an
issue dependency

Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393
Closes #22115

Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-03-28 13:23:25 -04:00
sillyguodong
2f49b55c19
Fix cannot reopen after pushing commits to a closed PR (#23189)
Close: #22784

1. On GH, we can reopen a PR which was closed before after pushing
commits. After reopening PR, we can see the commits that were pushed
after closing PR in the time line. So the case of
[issue](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22784) is a bug which
needs to be fixed.

2. After closing a PR and pushing commits, `headBranchSha` is not equal
to `sha`(which is the last commit ID string of reference). If the
judgement exists, the button of reopen will not display. So, skip the
judgement if the status of PR is closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222037529-651fccf9-0bba-433e-b2f0-79c17e0cc812.png)

3. Even if PR is already close, we should still insert comment record
into DB when we push commits.
So we should still call  function `CreatePushPullComment()`.

067b0c2664/services/pull/pull.go (L260-L282)
So, I add a switch(`includeClosed`) to the
`GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo` func to control whether the status
of PR must be open. In this case, by setting `includeClosed` to `true`,
we can query the closed PR.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222621045-bb80987c-10c5-4eac-aa0c-1fb9c6aefb51.png)

4. In the loop of comments, I use the`latestCloseCommentID` variable to
record the last occurrence of the close comment.
In the go template, if the status of PR is closed, the comments whose
type is `CommentTypePullRequestPush(29)` after `latestCloseCommentID`
won't be rendered.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222058913-c91cf3e3-819b-40c5-8015-654b31eeccff.png)
e.g.
1). The initial status of the PR is opened.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453617-33c5093e-f712-4cd6-8489-9f87e2075869.png)
2). Then I click the button of `Close`.  PR is closed now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453694-25c588a9-c121-4897-9ae5-0b13cf33d20b.png)
3). I try to push a commit to this PR, even though its current status is
closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453916-361678fb-7321-410d-9e37-5a26e8095638.png)
But in comments list, this commit do not display.This is as expected :)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454169-7617a791-78d2-404e-be5e-77d555f93313.png)
4). Click the `Reopen` button, the commit which is pushed after closing
PR display now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454533-897893b6-b96e-4701-b5cb-b1800f382b8f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-03 21:16:58 +08:00
wxiaoguang
ce73492d6f
Refactor ctx in templates (#23105)
Before, the `dict "ctx" ...` map is used to pass data between templates.

Now, more and more templates need to use real Go context:

* #22962
* #23092


`ctx` is a Go concept for `Context`, misusing it may cause problems, and
it makes it difficult to review or refactor.

This PR contains 2 major changes:

* In the top scope of a template, the `$` is the same as the `.`, so the
old labels_sidebar's `root` is the `ctx`. So this `ctx` could just be
removed.
bd7f218dce
* Rename all other `ctx` to `ctxData`, and it perfectly matches how it
comes from backend: `"ctxData": ctx.Data`.
7c01260e1d



From now on, there is no `ctx` in templates. There are only:

* `ctxData` for passing data
* `Context` for Go context
2023-03-02 11:44:06 -06:00
Jason Song
04347eb810
Use context parameter in services/repository (#23186)
Use context parameter in `services/repository`.

And use `cache.WithCacheContext(ctx)` to generate push action history
feeds.

Fix #23160
2023-02-28 16:17:51 -06:00
zeripath
ef4fc30246
Speed up HasUserStopwatch & GetActiveStopwatch (#23051)
GetActiveStopwatch & HasUserStopwatch is a hot piece of code that is
repeatedly called and on examination of the cpu profile for TestGit it
represents 0.44 seconds of CPU time. This PR reduces this time to 80ms.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
2023-02-27 13:46:00 -05:00
Brecht Van Lommel
10cdcb9ea8
Add "Reviewed by you" filter for pull requests (#22927)
This includes pull requests that you approved, requested changes or
commented on. Currently such pull requests are not visible in any of the
filters on /pulls, while they may need further action like merging, or
prodding the author or reviewers.

Especially when working with a large team on a repository it's helpful
to get a full overview of pull requests that may need your attention,
without having to sift through the complete list.
2023-02-24 21:55:50 -05:00
Brecht Van Lommel
6221a6fd54
Scoped labels (#22585)
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.

The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.

Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.

In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.

Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:

* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.

Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:

* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.

Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:

* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 21:17:39 +02:00
yp05327
bd66fa586a
Rename repo.GetOwner to repo.LoadOwner (#22967)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22963

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
2023-02-18 20:11:03 +08:00
Zettat123
0ab22a1a02
fix incorrect role labels for migrated issues and comments (#22914)
Fix #22797.

## Reason
If a comment was migrated from other platforms, this comment may have an
original author and its poster is always not the original author. When
the `roleDescriptor` func get the poster's role descriptor for a
comment, it does not check if the comment has an original author. So the
migrated comments' original authors might be marked as incorrect roles.

---------

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-15 12:29:13 -05:00
Lunny Xiao
bd820aa9c5
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.

But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.

The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
	ctx  context.Context
	data map[any]map[any]any
        lock sync.RWMutex
}

var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}

func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
	return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
		ctx:  ctx,
		data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
	})
}
```

Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.

```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```

Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.

```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
	return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
		return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
			res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
			if err != nil {
				return "", err
			}
			return res.SettingValue, nil
		})
	})
}
```

First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.

An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
wxiaoguang
e9288c2477
Fix improper HTMLURL usages in Go code (#22839)
In Go code, HTMLURL should be only used for external systems, like
API/webhook/mail/notification, etc.

If a URL is used by `Redirect` or rendered in a template, it should be a
relative URL (aka `Link()` in Gitea)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-11 14:34:11 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
8574a6433f
Show all projects, not just repo projects and open/closed projects (#22640)
This PR fixes two problems. One is when filter repository issues, only
repository level projects are listed. Another is if you list open
issues, only open projects will be displayed in filter options and if
you list closed issues, only closed projects will be displayed in filter
options.

In this PR, both repository level and org/user level projects will be
displayed in filter, and both open and closed projects will be listed as
filter items.

---------

Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-04 22:35:08 +08:00
techknowlogick
203681d084
Issues: support setting issue template field values with query (#22545) 2023-01-30 12:36:04 +08:00
techknowlogick
e88b529b31
Issues: add Project filter to issues list and search (#22544)
Currently only a single project like milestone, not multiple like
labels.

Implements #14298

Code by @brechtvl

---------

Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
2023-01-29 11:45:29 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
c8139c0f64
Webhooks: for issue close/reopen action, add commit ID that caused it (#22583)
The `commit_id` property name is the same as equivalent functionality in
GitHub. If the action was not caused by a commit, an empty string is
used.

This can for example be used to automatically add a Resolved label to an
issue fixed by a commit, or clear it when the issue is reopened.
2023-01-24 23:47:53 -05:00
Lunny Xiao
6fe3c8b398
Support org/user level projects (#22235)
Fix #13405

<img width="1151" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/209442911-7baa3924-c389-47b6-b63b-a740803e640e.png">

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-01-20 19:42:33 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
e0a8965208
Fix invalid issue branch reference if not specified in template (#22513)
When an issue template does not contain a ref, it would end up with an
invalid `ref/heads/` value instead of having no branch referenced .
2023-01-18 16:50:22 -05:00
Lunny Xiao
2782c14396
Supports wildcard protected branch (#20825)
This PR introduce glob match for protected branch name. The separator is
`/` and you can use `*` matching non-separator chars and use `**` across
separator.

It also supports input an exist or non-exist branch name as matching
condition and branch name condition has high priority than glob rule.

Should fix #2529 and #15705

screenshots

<img width="1160" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/205651179-ebb5492a-4ade-4bb4-a13c-965e8c927063.png">

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 16:00:22 +08:00
Jason Song
477a1cc40e
Improve utils of slices (#22379)
- Move the file `compare.go` and `slice.go` to `slice.go`.
- Fix `ExistsInSlice`, it's buggy
  - It uses `sort.Search`, so it assumes that the input slice is sorted.
- It passes `func(i int) bool { return slice[i] == target })` to
`sort.Search`, that's incorrect, check the doc of `sort.Search`.
- Conbine `IsInt64InSlice(int64, []int64)` and `ExistsInSlice(string,
[]string)` to `SliceContains[T]([]T, T)`.
- Conbine `IsSliceInt64Eq([]int64, []int64)` and `IsEqualSlice([]string,
[]string)` to `SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Add `SliceEqual[T]([]T, T)` as a distinction from
`SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Redesign `RemoveIDFromList([]int64, int64) ([]int64, bool)` to
`SliceRemoveAll[T]([]T, T) []T`.
- Add `SliceContainsFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` and
`SliceRemoveAllFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` for general use.
- Add comments to explain why not `golang.org/x/exp/slices`.
- Add unit tests.
2023-01-11 13:31:16 +08:00