Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-11-25 19:26:09 +01:00
Commit graph

24 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
TheFox0x7 4de909747b Add testifylint to lint checks (#4535)
go-require lint is ignored for now

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4535
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
2024-07-30 19:41:10 +00:00
Gusted 138942c09e
[CHORE] Move test related function to own package
- Go's deadcode eliminator is quite simple, if you put a public function
in a package `aa/bb` that is used only by tests, it would still be built
if package `aa/bb` was imported. This means that if such functions use
libraries relevant only to tests that those libraries would still be
be built and increase the binary size of a Go binary.
- This is also the case with Forgejo, `models/migrations/base/tests.go`
contained functions exclusively used by tests which (skipping some steps
here) imports https://github.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-go, which is
2MiB. The `code.gitea.io/gitea/models/migrations/base` package is
imported by `cmd/doctor` and thus the code of the clickhouse library is
also built and included in the Forgejo binary, although entirely unused
and not reachable.
- This patch moves the test-related functions to their own package, so
Go's deadcode eliminator knows not to build the test-related functions
and thus reduces the size of the Forgejo binary.
- It is not possible to move this to a `_test.go` file because Go does
not allow importing functions from such files, so any test helper
function must be in a non-test package and file.
- Reduction of size (built with `TAGS="sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify" make
build`):
  - Before: 95912040 bytes (92M)
  - After: 92306888 bytes (89M)
2024-07-14 17:00:49 +02:00
silverwind 12b199c5e5
Enable more revive linter rules (#30608)
Noteable additions:

- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches

Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.

(cherry picked from commit 74f0c84fa4245a20ce6fb87dac1faf2aeeded2a2)

Conflicts:
	.golangci.yml
	apply the linter recommendations to Forgejo code as well
2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
Gusted 2d9afd0c21
[CHORE] Remove Microsoft SQL Server Support
- Per https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/122
2024-04-05 23:37:36 +02:00
delvh e10ba5e5e0
Rename Sync2 -> Sync (#26479)
The xorm `Sync2` has already been deprecated in favor of `Sync`,
so let's do the same inside the Gitea codebase.

Command used to replace everything:
```sh
for i in $(ag Sync2 --files-with-matches); do vim $i -c ':%sno/Sync2/Sync/g' -c ':wq'; done
```
2023-08-13 21:17:21 +02:00
KN4CK3R 7866a6e0e2
Prevent primary key update on migration (#26192)
Fixes #25918

The migration fails on MSSQL because xorm tries to update the primary
key column. xorm prevents this if the column is marked as auto
increment:

c622cdaf89/internal/statements/update.go (L38-L40)

I think it would be better if xorm would check for primary key columns
here because updating such columns is bad practice. It looks like if
that auto increment check should do the same.

fyi @lunny
2023-07-28 09:54:31 +02:00
Jack Hay 18de83b2a3
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
    - `activitypub`
    - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
    - `misc`
    - `notification`
    - `organization`
    - `package`
    - `issue`
    - `repository`
    - `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
  -  `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
  - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection

### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">

## tokenRequiresScopes  Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error

## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
   -  _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
   - For example: 
   ```go
	m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
		m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
		m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
   ```

## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default

Closes #24501
Closes #24799

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
JakobDev aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues (#24406)
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.

## Screenshots

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)

The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.

## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.

## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration

**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
FuXiaoHei c757765a9e
Implement actions artifacts (#22738)
Implement action artifacts server api.

This change is used for supporting
https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact and
https://github.com/actions/download-artifact in gitea actions. It can
run sample workflow from doc
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/storing-workflow-data-as-artifacts.
The api design is inspired by
https://github.com/nektos/act/blob/master/pkg/artifacts/server.go and
includes some changes from gitea internal structs and methods.

Actions artifacts contains two parts:

- Gitea server api and storage (this pr implement basic design without
some complex cases supports)
- Runner communicate with gitea server api (in comming)

Old pr https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22345 is outdated after
actions merged. I create new pr from main branch.


![897f7694-3e0f-4f7c-bb4b-9936624ead45](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2142787/219382371-eb3cf810-e4e0-456b-a8ff-aecc2b1a1032.jpeg)

Add artifacts list in actions workflow page.
2023-05-19 21:37:57 +08:00
KN4CK3R bf999e4069
Add Debian package registry (#24426)
Co-authored-by: @awkwardbunny

This PR adds a Debian package registry.
You can follow [this
tutorial](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package) to build
a *.deb package for testing.
Source packages are not supported at the moment and I did not find
documentation of the architecture "all" and how these packages should be
treated.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/218126879-eb80a866-775c-4c8e-8529-5797203a64e6.png)

Part of #20751.

Revised copy of #22854.

---------

Co-authored-by: Brian Hong <brian@hongs.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-02 12:31:35 -04:00
Yarden Shoham c0ddec8a2a
Revert "Add Debian package registry" (#24412)
Reverts go-gitea/gitea#22854
2023-04-28 18:06:41 -04:00
KN4CK3R bf77e2163b
Add Debian package registry (#22854)
Co-authored-by: @awkwardbunny

This PR adds a Debian package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package) to build
a *.deb package for testing. Source packages are not supported at the
moment and I did not find documentation of the architecture "all" and
how these packages should be treated.

---------

Co-authored-by: Brian Hong <brian@hongs.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-04-28 17:51:36 -04:00
JakobDev c41bc4f127
Display when a repo was archived (#22664)
This adds the date a repo is archived to Gitea and shows it in the UI
and API. A feature, that GitHub has been [introduced
recently](https://github.blog/changelog/2022-11-23-repository-archive-date-now-shown-in-ui/).

I currently don't know how to correctly deal with the Date in the
template, as different languages have different ways of writing a date.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/234315187-7db5763e-d96e-4080-b894-9be178bfb6e1.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-04-26 10:46:26 -04:00
Jason Song ac384c4e1d
Support upload outputs and use needs context on Actions (#24230)
See [Defining outputs for
jobs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/defining-outputs-for-jobs)
and [Example usage of the needs
context](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts#example-usage-of-the-needs-context).

Related to:
- [actions-proto-def
#5](https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/5)
- [act_runner #133](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/133)

<details>
<summary>Tests & screenshots</summary>

Test workflow file:
```yaml
name: outputs
on: push

jobs:
  job1:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    outputs:
      output1: ${{ steps.step1.outputs.output1 }}
      output2: ${{ steps.step2.outputs.output2 }}
    steps:
      - name: step1
        id: step1
        run: |
          date -Is > output1
          cat output1
          echo "output1=$(cat output1)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
      - name: step2
        id: step2
        run: |
          cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > output2
          cat output2
          echo "output2=$(cat output2)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
  job2:
    needs: job1
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo ${{ needs.job1.outputs.output1 }}
      - run: echo ${{ needs.job1.outputs.output2 }}
      - run: echo ${{ needs.job1.result }}
```

<img width="397" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/233313322-903e7ebf-49a7-48e2-8c17-95a4581b3284.png">
<img width="385" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/233313442-30909135-1711-4b78-a5c6-133fcc79f47c.png">



</details>

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-22 16:12:41 -04:00
yp05327 fa3495183b
Add migration to fix external unit access mode of owner/admin team (#24117)
Fix the incorrect migration in #23675 and #24012

External Unit (Tracker and Wiki) access mode should be `read` in
owner/admin team.
2023-04-15 09:52:44 -04:00
yp05327 b7221bec34
Fix admin team access mode value in team_unit table (#24012)
Same as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23675
Feedback:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23879#issuecomment-1500923636
2023-04-13 21:06:10 +02:00
yp05327 6eb856c614
Fix owner team access mode value in team_unit table (#23675)
All `access_mode` value of Owner Teams are 0(AccessModeNone) in
`team_unit` table, which should be 4(AccessModeOwner)
In `team` table:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/227409457-1b9660ae-8cf7-49c8-a013-1850b46baebc.png)
In `team_unit` table:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/227409429-a793dd90-4ae1-4191-b95b-e288c591f9fd.png)

ps: In https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23630, `access_mode` in
`team_unit` is used to check the team unit permission, but I found that
user can not see issues in owned org repos.
2023-04-03 10:36:35 -04:00
KN4CK3R fbd4eaceed
Display image size for multiarch container images (#23821)
Fixes #23771

Changes the display of different architectures for multiarch images to
show the image size:

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/228781477-cc76c4d1-4728-434f-8a27-fc008790d924.png)
2023-04-02 17:53:37 +08:00
Zettat123 b958dba1a0
Improve indices for action table (#23532)
Close #21611 

Add the index mentioned in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21611#issuecomment-1451113252 .
Since we already have an index for `("created_unix", "user_id",
"is_deleted")` columns on PostgreSQL, I removed the database type check
to apply this index to all types of databases.
2023-03-24 23:44:33 +08:00
sillyguodong 371520d7ab
Display the version of runner in the runner list (#23490)
Close: #23489 

### Change
1. Add version column to action_runner table.
2. Read the runner version from the request header, and update it in DB.
3. Display version in runner list

### Screenshot

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/225220990-98bc0158-4403-4e6c-9805-31bbbc65a802.png)
2023-03-19 22:19:40 -04:00
yp05327 8e45fcb63a
Do not store user projects as organization projects (#23353)
A part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22865

At first, I think we do not need 3 ProjectTypes, as we can check user
type, but it seems that it is not database friendly.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-03-17 21:07:23 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 27494ed20d
Fix missed migration in #22235 (#23482)
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-03-15 10:33:10 +01:00
KN4CK3R 2173f14708
Add user webhooks (#21563)
Currently we can add webhooks for organizations but not for users. This
PR adds the latter. You can access it from the current users settings.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/197391408-15dfdc23-b476-4d0c-82f7-9bc9b065988f.png)
2023-03-10 08:28:32 -06:00
Jason Song edf98a2dc3
Require approval to run actions for fork pull request (#22803)
Currently, Gitea will run actions automatically which are triggered by
fork pull request. It's a security risk, people can create a PR and
modify the workflow yamls to execute a malicious script.

So we should require approval for first-time contributors, which is the
default strategy of a public repo on GitHub, see [Approving workflow
runs from public
forks](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks).

Current strategy:

- don't need approval if it's not a fork PR;
- always need approval if the user is restricted;
- don't need approval if the user can write;
- don't need approval if the user has been approved before;
- otherwise, need approval.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217207121-badf50a8-826c-4425-bef1-d82d1979bc81.mov

GitHub has an option for that, you can see that at
`/<owner>/<repo>/settings/actions`, and we can support that later.

<img width="835" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217199990-2967e68b-e693-4e59-8186-ab33a1314a16.png">

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-24 15:58:49 +08:00