Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-12-13 15:01:58 +01:00
Commit graph

110 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gusted
15c64122a6
[BUG] Don't fire notification for comment of pending review
- When a comment was updated or deleted and was part of an
pending/ongoing review, it would have triggered a notification, such as
a webhook.
- This patch checks if the comment is part of a pending review and then
does not fire a notification and, in the case of updating a comment,
does not save the content history because this is not necessary if it is
still a "draft" comment given it is a pending comment (there is no need
to see my embarrassing typos).
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4368
2024-08-18 17:04:00 +02:00
TheFox0x7
4de909747b Add testifylint to lint checks (#4535)
go-require lint is ignored for now

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4535
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
2024-07-30 19:41:10 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
47a2102694
Performance improvements for pull request list API (#30490)
Fix #30483

---------

Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 352a2cae247afa254241f113c5c22b9351f116b9)
2024-06-02 16:26:54 +02:00
metiftikci
ca0921a95a
Prevent simultaneous editing of comments and issues (#31053)
fixes #22907

Tested:
- [x] issue content edit
- [x] issue content change tasklist
- [x] pull request content edit
- [x] pull request change tasklist

![issue-content-edit](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/29250154/a0828889-fb96-4bc4-8600-da92e3205812)

(cherry picked from commit aa92b13164e84c26be91153b6022220ce0a27720)

Conflicts:
	models/issues/comment.go
	 c7a389f2b2 [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments

	options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
	 trivial context conflicts

	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
	services/issue/comments.go
	services/issue/content.go
         user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo

	routers/web/repo/issue.go
	 trivial difference from 6a0750177f Allow to save empty comment
         user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo

	templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
	 templates changed a lot in Forgejo but the change is
	 trivially ported

	tests/integration/issue_test.go
	 other tests were added in the same region

	web_src/js/features/repo-issue-edit.js
	 the code is still web_src/js/features/repo-legacy.js
	 trivially ported
2024-06-02 16:26:54 +02:00
Yaroslav Halchenko
2b2fd2728c Add codespell support and fix a good number of typos with its help (#3270)
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .

I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.

```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
	@echo " - lint-spell                       lint spelling"
	@echo " - lint-spell-fix                   lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml:      - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml:      - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
2024-05-09 13:49:37 +00:00
silverwind
12b199c5e5
Enable more revive linter rules (#30608)
Noteable additions:

- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches

Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.

(cherry picked from commit 74f0c84fa4245a20ce6fb87dac1faf2aeeded2a2)

Conflicts:
	.golangci.yml
	apply the linter recommendations to Forgejo code as well
2024-04-28 15:39:00 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
3ba127c618
[Port] gitea#29999: Fix Add/Remove WIP on pull request title failure
Fix #29997

---

Conflict resolution:
- Use Forgejo's user blocking feature (services/issue/issue.go)
- Trivial (tests/integration/pull_review_test.go)
Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2872
(cherry picked from commit 475b6e839caa88994318f905f0965c3b418f876a)
2024-03-29 12:21:51 +01:00
Jimmy Praet
003881b06d
[Port] gitea#29842: Notify reviewers added via CODEOWNERS
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28297

This PR also fixed a problem that it needs a database transaction when
removing the WIP title.

---

Resolves #2771
Also partially ports gitea#29783

(cherry picked from commit 17d7ab5ad4ce3d0fbc1251572c22687c237a30b1)
2024-03-28 14:58:39 +01:00
Zettat123
77c56e29de
Allow non-admin users to delete review requests (#29057)
Fix #14459

The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit

(cherry picked from commit c42083a33950be6ee9f822c6d0de3c3a79d1f51b)

Conflicts:
	models/repo/repo_list_test.go
	tests/integration/api_nodeinfo_test.go
	tests/integration/api_repo_test.go
	shared fixture counts
2024-02-26 22:30:27 +01:00
Earl Warren
7cbf05fafb
Merge remote-tracking branch 'forgejo/forgejo-dependency' into wip-forgejo
Conflicts:
	.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml
	trivial conflict
2024-02-09 19:00:54 +01:00
Caesar Schinas
271db6ff22
[FEAT] support .forgejo dir for issue and PR templates 2024-02-06 10:22:32 +01:00
Gusted
9bb188176e
[MODERATION] Block issue creation when blocked by repo owner (squash)
- Block the creation of a issue if the user is blocked by the repository owner.
- Fix integration tests (This should ideally in the future all be
self-created fixtures instead of relying on the existing ones as a small
condition can make the tests be inaccurate).

(cherry picked from commit 88d3ee333a)
(cherry picked from commit 146c82d232)
(cherry picked from commit d9dc25d038)
(cherry picked from commit cd1eadd923)
(cherry picked from commit 40a8584bbb)
2024-02-05 15:56:58 +01:00
Gusted
2da33aae2d
[MODERATION] User blocking
- Add the ability to block a user via their profile page.
- This will unstar their repositories and visa versa.
- Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations).
- Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests.
- Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments.
- Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540
(cherry picked from commit 687d852480)
(cherry picked from commit 0c32a4fde5)
(cherry picked from commit 1791130e3c)
(cherry picked from commit 37858b7e8f)
(cherry picked from commit a3e2bfd7e9)
(cherry picked from commit 7009b9fe87)

Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1014
        routers/web/user/profile.go
        templates/user/profile.tmpl
(cherry picked from commit b2aec34791)
(cherry picked from commit e2f1b73752)

[MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802)

- Resolves #476
- Follow up for: #540
- Ensure that the doer and blocked person cannot follow each other.
- Ensure that the block person cannot watch doer's repositories.
- Add unblock button to the blocked user list.
- Add blocked since information to the blocked user list.
- Add extra testing to moderation code.
- Blocked user will unwatch doer's owned repository upon blocking.
- Add flash messages to let the user know the block/unblock action was successful.
- Add "You haven't blocked any users" message.
- Add organization blocking a user.

Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/802
(cherry picked from commit 0505a10421)
(cherry picked from commit 37b4e6ef9b)
(cherry picked from commit c17c121f2c)

[MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802) (squash)

Changes to adapt to:

  6bbccdd177 Improve AJAX link and modal confirm dialog (#25210)

Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/882/files#issuecomment-945962
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/882#issue-330561
(cherry picked from commit 523635f83c)
(cherry picked from commit 4743eaa6a0)
(cherry picked from commit eff5b43d2e)

Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1014
        routers/web/user/profile.go
(cherry picked from commit 9d359be5ed)
(cherry picked from commit b1f3069a22)

[MODERATION] add user blocking API

- Follow up for: #540, #802
- Add API routes for user blocking from user and organization
perspective.
- The new routes have integration testing.
- The new model functions have unit tests.
- Actually quite boring to write and to read this pull request.

(cherry picked from commit f3afaf15c7)
(cherry picked from commit 6d754db3e5)
(cherry picked from commit 2a89ddc0ac)
(cherry picked from commit 4a147bff7e)

Conflicts:
        routers/api/v1/api.go
        templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl
(cherry picked from commit bb8c339185)
(cherry picked from commit 5a11569a01)
(cherry picked from commit 2373c801ee)

[MODERATION] restore redirect on unblock

 ctx.RedirectToFirst(ctx.FormString("redirect_to"), ctx.ContextUser.HomeLink())

was replaced by

 ctx.JSONOK()

in 128d77a3a Following up fixes for "Fix inconsistent user profile layout across tabs" (#25739)

thus changing the behavior (nicely spotted by the tests). This
restores it.

(cherry picked from commit 597c243707)
(cherry picked from commit cfa539e590)

[MODERATION] Add test case (squash)

- Add an test case, to test an property of the function.

(cherry picked from commit 70dadb1916)

[MODERATION] Block adding collaborators

- Ensure that the doer and blocked user cannot add each other as
collaborators to repositories.
- The Web UI gets an detailed message of the specific situation, the API
gets an generic Forbidden code.
- Unit tests has been added.
- Integration testing for Web and API has been added.
- This commit doesn't introduce removing each other as collaborators on
the block action, due to the complexity of database calls that needs to
be figured out. That deserves its own commit and test code.

(cherry picked from commit 747be949a1)

[MODERATION] move locale_en-US.ini strings to avoid conflicts

Conflicts:
        web_src/css/org.css
        web_src/css/user.css
        https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1180

(cherry picked from commit e53f955c88)

Conflicts:
        services/issue/comments.go
        https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1212
(cherry picked from commit b4a454b576)

Conflicts:
        models/forgejo_migrations/migrate.go
        options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
        services/pull/pull.go
        https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1264

[MODERATION] Remove blocked user collaborations with doer

- When the doer blocks an user, who is also an collaborator on an
repository that the doer owns, remove that collaboration.
- Added unit tests.
- Refactor the unit test to be more organized.

(cherry picked from commit ec87016178)
(cherry picked from commit 313e6174d8)

[MODERATION] QoL improvements (squash)

- Ensure that organisations cannot be blocked. It currently has no
effect, as all blocked operations cannot be executed from an
organisation standpoint.
- Refactored the API route to make use of the `UserAssignmentAPI`
middleware.
- Make more use of `t.Run` so that the test code is more clear about
which block of code belongs to which test case.
- Added more integration testing (to ensure the organisations cannot be
blocked and some authorization/permission checks).

(cherry picked from commit e9d638d075)

[MODERATION] s/{{avatar/{{ctx.AvatarUtils.Avatar/

(cherry picked from commit ce8b30be13)
(cherry picked from commit f911dc4025)

Conflicts:
	options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1354
(cherry picked from commit c1b37b7fda)
(cherry picked from commit 856a2e0903)

[MODERATION] Show graceful error on comment creation

- When someone is blocked by the repository owner or issue poster and
try to comment on that issue, they get shown a graceful error.
- Adds integration test.

(cherry picked from commit 490646302e)
(cherry picked from commit d3d88667cb)
(cherry picked from commit 6818de13a9)

[MODERATION] Show graceful error on comment creation (squash) typo

(cherry picked from commit 1588d4834a)
(cherry picked from commit d510ea52d0)
(cherry picked from commit 8249e93a14)

[MODERATION] Refactor integration testing (squash)

- Motivation for this PR is that I'd noticed that a lot of repeated
calls are happening between the test functions and that certain tests
weren't using helper functions like `GetCSRF`, therefor this refactor of
the integration tests to keep it: clean, small and hopefully more
maintainable and understandable.
- There are now three integration tests: `TestBlockUser`,
`TestBlockUserFromOrganization` and `TestBlockActions` (and has been
moved in that order in the source code).
- `TestBlockUser` is for doing blocking related actions as an user and
`TestBlockUserFromOrganization` as an organisation, even though they
execute the same kind of tests they do not share any database calls or
logic and therefor it currently doesn't make sense to merge them
together (hopefully such oppurtinutiy might be presented in the future).
- `TestBlockActions` now contain all tests for actions that should be
blocked after blocking has happened, most tests now share the same doer
and blocked users and a extra fixture has been added to make this
possible for the comment test.
- Less code, more comments and more re-use between tests.

(cherry picked from commit ffb393213d)
(cherry picked from commit 85505e0f81)
(cherry picked from commit 0f3cf17761)

[MODERATION] Fix network error (squash)

- Fix network error toast messages on user actions such as follow and
unfollow. This happened because the javascript code now expects an JSON
to be returned, but this wasn't the case due to
cfa539e590127b4953b010fba3dea21c82a1714.
- The integration testing has been adjusted to instead test for the
returned flash cookie.

(cherry picked from commit 112bc25e54)
(cherry picked from commit 1194fe4899)
(cherry picked from commit 9abb95a844)

[MODERATION] Modernize frontend (squash)

- Unify blocked users list.
- Use the new flex list classes for blocked users list to avoid using
the CSS helper classes and thereby be consistent in the design.
- Fix the modal by using the new modal class.
- Remove the icon in the modal as looks too big in the new design.
- Fix avatar not displaying as it was passing the context where the user
should've been passed.
- Don't use italics for 'Blocked since' text.
- Use namelink template to display the user's name and homelink.

(cherry picked from commit ec935a16a3)
(cherry picked from commit 67f37c8346)

Conflicts:
	models/user/follow.go
	models/user/user_test.go
	routers/api/v1/user/follower.go
	routers/web/shared/user/header.go
	routers/web/user/profile.go
	templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1468
(cherry picked from commit 6a9626839c)

Conflicts:
	tests/integration/api_nodeinfo_test.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1508#issuecomment-1242385
(cherry picked from commit 7378b251b4)

Conflicts:
	models/fixtures/watch.yml
	models/issues/reaction.go
	models/issues/reaction_test.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_reaction.go
	routers/web/repo/issue.go
	services/issue/issue.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1547
(cherry picked from commit c2028930c1)
(cherry picked from commit d3f9134aee)
(cherry picked from commit 7afe154c5c)
(cherry picked from commit 99ac7353eb)
(cherry picked from commit a9cde00c5c)

Conflicts:
	services/user/delete.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1736
(cherry picked from commit 008c0cc63d)

[DEADCODE] add exceptions

(cherry picked from commit 12ddd2b10e)

[MODERATION] Remove deadcode (squash)

- Remove deadcode that's no longer used by Forgejo.

(cherry picked from commit 0faeab4fa9)

[MODERATION] Add repo transfers to blocked functionality (squash)

- When someone gets blocked, remove all pending repository transfers
from the blocked user to the doer.
- Do not allow to start transferring repositories to the doer as blocked user.
- Added unit testing.
- Added integration testing.

(cherry picked from commit 8a3caac330)
(cherry picked from commit a92b4cfeb6)
(cherry picked from commit acaaaf07d9)
(cherry picked from commit 735818863c)
(cherry picked from commit f50fa43b32)
(cherry picked from commit e166836433)
(cherry picked from commit 82a0e4a381)
(cherry picked from commit ff233c19c4)
(cherry picked from commit 8ad87d215f)

[MODERATION] Fix unblock action (squash)

- Pass the whole context instead of only giving pieces.
- This fixes CSRF not correctly being inserted into the unblock buttons.

(cherry picked from commit 2aa51922ba)
(cherry picked from commit 7ee8db0f01)
(cherry picked from commit e4f8b999bc)
(cherry picked from commit 05aea60b13)
(cherry picked from commit dc0d61b012)
(cherry picked from commit f53fa583de)
(cherry picked from commit c65b89a58d)
(cherry picked from commit 69e50b9969)
(cherry picked from commit ec127440b8)

[MODERATION] cope with shared fixtures

* There is one more issue in the fixtures and this breaks some tests
* The users in the shared fixtures were renamed for clarity and that
  breaks some tests

(cherry picked from commit 707a4edbdf)

Conflicts:
	modules/indexer/issues/indexer_test.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1508
(cherry picked from commit 82cc044366)
(cherry picked from commit 2776aec7e8)
(cherry picked from commit 1fbde36dc7)
(cherry picked from commit 1293db3c4e)
(cherry picked from commit 6476802175)
(cherry picked from commit 5740f2fc83)
(cherry picked from commit afc12d7b6e)

[MODERATION] Fix transfer confirmation (squash)

- Fix problem caused by the clearer confirmation for dangerous actions commit.

(cherry picked from commit 3488f4a9cb)
(cherry picked from commit ed7de91f6a)
(cherry picked from commit 2d97929b9b)
(cherry picked from commit 50d035a7b0)
(cherry picked from commit 0a0c07d78a)
(cherry picked from commit 85e55c4dbc)
(cherry picked from commit d8282122ad)
(cherry picked from commit 3f0b3b6cc5)

[MODERATION] Purge issues on user deletion (squash)

(cherry picked from commit 4f529d9596)
(cherry picked from commit f0e3acadd3)
(cherry picked from commit 682c4effe6)
(cherry picked from commit e43c2d84fd)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8e53ccc7)
(cherry picked from commit a9eb7ac783)

[MODERATION] Purge issues on user deletion (squash) revert shared fixtures workarounds

(cherry picked from commit 7224653a40)
(cherry picked from commit aa6e8672f9)
(cherry picked from commit 58c7947e95)
(cherry picked from commit f1aacb1851)
(cherry picked from commit 0bf174af87)
(cherry picked from commit f9706f4335)

[MODERATION] Prepare moderation for context locale changes (squash)

- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1711

(cherry picked from commit 2e289baea9)
(cherry picked from commit 97b16bc19a)

[MODERATION] User blocking (squash) do not use shared fixture

It conflicts with a fixtured added in the commit
Fix comment permissions (#28213) (#28216)

(cherry picked from commit ab40799dcab24e9f495d765268b791931da81684)
(cherry picked from commit 996c92cafd)
(cherry picked from commit 259912e3a6)

Conflicts:
	options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1921
(cherry picked from commit 1e82abc032)
(cherry picked from commit a176fee160)
(cherry picked from commit 0480b76dfe)
(cherry picked from commit 4bc06b7b38)
(cherry picked from commit 073094cf72)
(cherry picked from commit ac6201c647)
(cherry picked from commit 7e0812674d)
(cherry picked from commit 068c741e56)

Conflicts:
	models/repo_transfer.go
	models/repo_transfer_test.go
	routers/web/user/profile.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2298
2024-02-05 15:56:45 +01:00
Earl Warren
c7a389f2b2
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.

A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.

That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.

A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.

(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)

Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go

That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.

(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)

Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.

(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)

Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation

The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition

The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.

(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)

Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)

Pettier code to set the update time of comments

Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)

XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.

(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)

Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.

When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.

This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.

(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)

Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests

Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.

The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)

Conflicts:
	services/issue/issue.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3d)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec7)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)

[this is a follow-up to PR #764]

When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.

-----

Comment:

While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...

I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1da)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c4)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686)
(cherry picked from commit 511c519c87)
(cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f61)
(cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param

See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a

(cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9)
(cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d)
(cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6)
(cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a49)
(cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c2)
(cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a74)
2024-02-05 14:44:33 +01:00
Nanguan Lin
6a725b6f9c
Remove deadcode under models/issues (#28536)
Using the Go Official tool `golang.org/x/tools/cmd/deadcode@latest`
mentioned by [go blog](https://go.dev/blog/deadcode).
Just use `deadcode .` in the project root folder and it gives a list of
unused functions. Though it has some false alarms.
This PR removes dead code detected in `models/issues`.
2023-12-19 20:12:02 +01:00
JakobDev
ebe803e514
Penultimate round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27414)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-11 04:24:07 +00:00
yp05327
5a7ab86b98
Avoid run change title process when the title is same (#27467)
If user only changed the target branch or just did nothing and clicked
the `Save` button, you will see the change log as following:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/d30927dd-9227-4653-8fac-b890ef0b3f88)

This makes no sense, so we should check whether the title is surely
changed before run the `ChangeTitle`.
2023-10-06 18:00:53 +00:00
JakobDev
cc5df26680
Even more db.DefaultContext refactor (#27352)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-10-03 10:30:41 +00:00
Earl Warren
cb68e01e22
simplify issue deletion query (#27312)
- There's no need for `In` to be used, as it's a single parameter that's
being passed.

Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1521

(cherry picked from commit 4a4955f43a)

Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
2023-10-02 02:30:10 +00:00
JakobDev
cf0df023be
More db.DefaultContext refactor (#27265)
Part of #27065

This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
2023-09-29 12:12:54 +00:00
JakobDev
1c039b4e1e
Fix Bug in Issue Config when only contact links are set (#26521)
Blank Issues should be enabled if they are not explicit disabled through
the `blank_issues_enabled` field of the Issue Config. The Implementation
has currently a Bug: If you create a Issue Config file with only
`contact_links` and without a `blank_issues_enabled` field,
`blank_issues_enabled` is set to false by default.

The fix is only one line, but I decided to also improve the tests to
make sure there are no other problems with the Implementation.

This is a bugfix, so it should be backported to 1.20.
2023-09-28 20:16:40 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
673cf6af76
make writing main test easier (#27270)
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-28 01:38:53 +00:00
JakobDev
f91dbbba98
Next round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27089)
Part of #27065
2023-09-16 14:39:12 +00:00
JakobDev
c548dde205
More refactoring of db.DefaultContext (#27083)
Next step of #27065
2023-09-15 06:13:19 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
da50be7360
Replace 'userxx' with 'orgxx' in all test files when the user type is org (#27052)
Currently 'userxx' and 'orgxx' are both used as username in test files
when the user type is org, which is confusing. This PR replaces all
'userxx' with 'orgxx' when the user type is org(`user.type==1`).
Some non-trivial changes
1. Rename `user3` dir to `org3` in `tests/git-repositories-meta` 
2. Change `end` in `issue reference` because 'org3' is one char shorter
than 'user3'

![ksnip_20230913-112819](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/442988c5-4cf4-49b8-aa01-4dd6bf0ca954)
3. Change the search result number of `user/repo2` because
`user3/repo21` can't be searched now

![ksnip_20230913-112931](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/d9ebeba4-479f-4110-9a85-825efbc981fd)
4. Change the first org name getting from API because the result is
ordered by alphabet asc and now `org 17` is before `org25`
![JW8U7NIO(J$H
_YCRB36H)T](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/f55a685c-cf24-40e5-a87f-3a2327319548)
![)KFD411O4I8RB5ZOH7E0
Z3](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/a0dc3299-249c-46f6-91cb-d15d4ee88dd5)

Other modifications are just find all and replace all.
Unit tests with SQLite are all passed.

---------

Co-authored-by: caicandong <1290147055@qq.com>
2023-09-14 02:59:53 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
4f32abaf94
move repository deletion to service layer (#26948)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-08 04:51:15 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
540bf9fa6d
Move notification interface to services layer (#26915)
Extract from #22266
2023-09-05 18:37:47 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
36eb3c433a
Add transaction when creating pull request created dirty data (#26259)
Fix #26129
Replace #26258 

This PR will introduce a transaction on creating pull request so that if
some step failed, it will rollback totally. And there will be no dirty
pull request exist.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-10 02:39:21 +00:00
wxiaoguang
e4b1ea6f15
Bypass MariaDB performance bug of the "IN" sub-query, fix incorrect IssueIndex (#26279)
Close #26277
Fix #26285
2023-08-07 12:23:59 +02:00
caicandong
6151e69d95
Delete issue_service.CreateComment (#26298)
I noticed that `issue_service.CreateComment` adds transaction operations
on `issues_model.CreateComment`, we can merge the two functions and we
can avoid calling each other's methods in the `services` layer.

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-04 13:34:34 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
b167f35113
Add context parameter to some database functions (#26055)
To avoid deadlock problem, almost database related functions should be
have ctx as the first parameter.
This PR do a refactor for some of these functions.
2023-07-22 22:14:27 +08:00
6543
8995046110
Less naked returns (#25713)
just a step towards  #25655

and some related refactoring
2023-07-07 05:31:56 +00:00
Vladimir Buyanov
3bdd48016f
Add codeowners feature (#24910)
Hello.
This PR adds a github like configuration for the CODEOWNERS file.

Resolves: #10161
2023-06-08 16:56:05 +08:00
谈笑风生间
a5acec329e
Rename NotifyPullReviewRequest to NotifyPullRequestReviewRequest (#24988)
after #24481

To keep consistent, maybe pull_request_review_request is better.

## what my pull request does

Rename NotifyPullReviewRequest to NotifyPullRequestReviewRequest.

<img width="1087" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/2cf91f02-74f2-42fe-a998-0a039b821d8d">
2023-05-31 15:54:46 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
f9cfd6ce5b
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634)
This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.

Fix #15367
Replaces #23070 
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.

We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.

Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.

> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
> 
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
> 
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
> 
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
> 
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-26 01:04:48 +00:00
JakobDev
aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues (#24406)
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.

## Screenshots

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)

The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.

## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.

## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration

**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
wxiaoguang
def4956122
Improve Gitea's web context, decouple "issue template" code into service package (#24590)
1. Remove unused fields/methods in web context.
2. Make callers call target function directly instead of the light
wrapper like "IsUserRepoReaderSpecific"
3. The "issue template" code shouldn't be put in the "modules/context"
package, so move them to the service package.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-09 01:30:14 +02:00
KN4CK3R
f1173d6879
Use more specific test methods (#24265)
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-22 17:56:27 -04:00
wxiaoguang
de2268ffab
Fix issue attachment handling (#24202)
Close #24195

Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
f07b0de997
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)


The bug is:

1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview


This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-20 02:39:44 -04:00
wxiaoguang
cfe3d6e9b5
Make more functions use ctx instead of db.DefaultContext (#24068)
Continue the "ctx refactoring" work.

There are still a lot db.DefaultContext, incorrect context could cause
database deadlock errors.
2023-04-14 14:18:28 -04:00
Brecht Van Lommel
c8139c0f64
Webhooks: for issue close/reopen action, add commit ID that caused it (#22583)
The `commit_id` property name is the same as equivalent functionality in
GitHub. If the action was not caused by a commit, an empty string is
used.

This can for example be used to automatically add a Resolved label to an
issue fixed by a commit, or clear it when the issue is reopened.
2023-01-24 23:47:53 -05:00
Brecht Van Lommel
cdf53fa4a7
Fix issue not auto-closing when it includes a reference to a branch (#22514)
Ensure branch prefix is stripped away for both when comparing the branch
name.
2023-01-18 19:24:38 -05:00
Jason Song
6135359a04
Always reuse transaction (#22362) 2023-01-08 09:34:58 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
68704532c2
Rename almost all Ctx functions (#22071) 2022-12-10 10:46:31 +08:00
Jason Song
74874d065f
Fix issue/PR numbers (#22037)
When deleting a closed issue, we should update both `NumIssues`and
`NumClosedIssues`, or `NumOpenIssues`(`= NumIssues -NumClosedIssues`)
will be wrong. It's the same for pull requests.

Releated to #21557.

Alse fixed two harmless problems:

- The SQL to check issue/PR total numbers is wrong, that means it will
update the numbers even if they are correct.
- Replace legacy `num_issues = num_issues + 1` operations with
`UpdateRepoIssueNumbers`.
2022-12-06 15:53:09 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
0a7d3ff786
refactor some functions to support ctx as first parameter (#21878)
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2022-12-03 10:48:26 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
zeripath
e77b76425e
Prepend refs/heads/ to issue template refs (#20461)
Fix #20456

At some point during the 1.17 cycle abbreviated refishs to issue
branches started breaking. This is likely due serious inconsistencies in
our management of refs throughout Gitea - which is a bug needing to be
addressed in a different PR. (Likely more than one)

We should try to use non-abbreviated `fullref`s as much as possible.
That is where a user has inputted a abbreviated `refish` we should add
`refs/heads/` if it is `branch` etc. I know people keep writing and
merging PRs that remove prefixes from stored content but it is just
wrong and it keeps causing problems like this. We should only remove the
prefix at the time of
presentation as the prefix is the only way of knowing umambiguously and
permanently if the `ref` is referring to a `branch`, `tag` or `commit` /
`SHA`. We need to make it so that every ref has the appropriate prefix,
and probably also need to come up with some definitely unambiguous way
of storing `SHA`s if they're used in a `ref` or `refish` field. We must
not store a potentially
ambiguous `refish` as a `ref`. (Especially when referring a `tag` -
there is no reason why users cannot create a `branch` with the same
short name as a `tag` and vice versa and any attempt to prevent this
will fail. You can even create a `branch` and a
`tag` that matches the `SHA` pattern.)

To that end in order to fix this bug, when parsing issue templates check
the provided `Ref` (here a `refish` because almost all users do not know
or understand the subtly), if it does not start with `refs/` add the
`BranchPrefix` to it. This allows people to make their templates refer
to a `tag` but not to a `SHA` directly. (I don't think that is
particularly unreasonable but if people disagree I can make the `refish`
be checked to see if it matches the `SHA` pattern.)

Next we need to handle the issue links that are already written. The
links here are created with `git.RefURL`

Here we see there is a bug introduced in #17551 whereby the provided
`ref` argument can be double-escaped so we remove the incorrect external
escape. (The escape added in #17551 is in the right place -
unfortunately I missed that the calling function was doing the wrong
thing.)

Then within `RefURL()` we check if an unprefixed `ref` (therefore
potentially a `refish`) matches the `SHA` pattern before assuming that
is actually a `commit` - otherwise is assumed to be a `branch`. This
will handle most of the problem cases excepting the very unusual cases
where someone has deliberately written a `branch` to look like a `SHA1`.

But please if something is called a `ref` or interpreted as a `ref` make
it a full-ref before storing or using it. By all means if something is a
`branch` assume the prefix is removed but always add it back in if you
are using it as a `ref`. Stop storing abbreviated `branch` names and
`tag` names - which are `refish` as a `ref`. It will keep on causing
problems like this.

Fix #20456

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-22 20:58:49 +08:00
KN4CK3R
044c754ea5
Add context.Context to more methods (#21546)
This PR adds a context parameter to a bunch of methods. Some helper
`xxxCtx()` methods got replaced with the normal name now.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-19 16:12:33 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
34283a74e8
Allow detect whether it's in a database transaction for a context.Context (#21756)
Fix #19513

This PR introduce a new db method `InTransaction(context.Context)`,
and also builtin check on `db.TxContext` and `db.WithTx`.
There is also a new method `db.AutoTx` has been introduced but could be used by other PRs.

`WithTx` will always open a new transaction, if a transaction exist in context, return an error.
`AutoTx` will try to open a new transaction if no transaction exist in context.
That means it will always enter a transaction if there is no error.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2022-11-12 21:18:50 +01:00