* make blue really blue
* replace blue button and label classes with primary
* add --color-blue-dark
* add light color variants, tweak a few colors
* fix colors
* add comment
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
- This is a continuation on [the work](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19546) I've done for improving mobile experience on Gitea.
- The current behavior of going trough the commits list is horrible, each individual item gets it's own row and thereby isn't quite compact as it should be on mobile. The commit view's header is in a bit better state, it's quite only that content is overlapping each other.
- This patch fixes those problems. Each row in the commit list table will actually take a row in the UI. The commit view's header has now a better organized way of placing the information.
* Fix indention
Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>
* Add option to merge a pr right now without waiting for the checks to succeed
Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>
* Fix lint
Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>
* Add scheduled pr merge to tables used for testing
Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>
* Add status param to make GetPullRequestByHeadBranch reusable
Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>
* Move "Merge now" to a seperate button to make the ui clearer
Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>
* Update models/scheduled_pull_request_merge.go
Co-authored-by: 赵智超 <1012112796@qq.com>
* Update web_src/js/index.js
Co-authored-by: 赵智超 <1012112796@qq.com>
* Update web_src/js/index.js
Co-authored-by: 赵智超 <1012112796@qq.com>
* Re-add migration after merge
* Fix frontend lint
* Fix version compare
* Add vendored dependencies
* Add basic tets
* Make sure the api route is capable of scheduling PRs for merging
* Fix comparing version
* make vendor
* adopt refactor
* apply suggestion: User -> Doer
* init var once
* Fix Test
* Update templates/repo/issue/view_content/comments.tmpl
* adopt
* nits
* next
* code format
* lint
* use same name schema; rm CreateUnScheduledPRToAutoMergeComment
* API: can not create schedule twice
* Add TestGetBranchNamesForSha
* nits
* new go routine for each pull to merge
* Update models/pull.go
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* Update models/scheduled_pull_request_merge.go
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* fix & add renaming sugestions
* Update services/automerge/pull_auto_merge.go
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* fix conflict relicts
* apply latest refactors
* fix: migration after merge
* Update models/error.go
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* adapt latest refactors
* fix test
* use more context
* skip potential edgecases
* document func usage
* GetBranchNamesForSha() -> GetRefsBySha()
* start refactoring
* ajust to new changes
* nit
* docu nit
* the great check move
* move checks for branchprotection into own package
* resolve todo now ...
* move & rename
* unexport if posible
* fix
* check if merge is allowed before merge on scheduled pull
* debugg
* wording
* improve SetDefaults & nits
* NotAllowedToMerge -> DisallowedToMerge
* fix test
* merge files
* use package "errors"
* merge files
* add string names
* other implementation for gogit
* adapt refactor
* more context for models/pull.go
* GetUserRepoPermission use context
* more ctx
* use context for loading pull head/base-repo
* more ctx
* more ctx
* models.LoadIssueCtx()
* models.LoadIssueCtx()
* Handle pull_service.Merge in one DB transaction
* add TODOs
* next
* next
* next
* more ctx
* more ctx
* Start refactoring structure of old pull code ...
* move code into new packages
* shorter names ... and finish **restructure**
* Update models/branches.go
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* finish UpdateProtectBranch
* more and fix
* update datum
* template: use "svg" helper
* rename prQueue 2 prPatchCheckerQueue
* handle automerge in queue
* lock pull on git&db actions ...
* lock pull on git&db actions ...
* add TODO notes
* the regex
* transaction in tests
* GetRepositoryByIDCtx
* shorter table name and lint fix
* close transaction bevore notify
* Update models/pull.go
* next
* CheckPullMergable check all branch protections!
* Update routers/web/repo/pull.go
* CheckPullMergable check all branch protections!
* Revert "PullService lock via pullID (#19520)" (for now...)
This reverts commit 6cde7c9159a5ea75a10356feb7b8c7ad4c434a9a.
* Update services/pull/check.go
* Use for a repo action one database transaction
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Update services/issue/status.go
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Update services/issue/status.go
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* use db.WithTx()
* gofmt
* make pr.GetDefaultMergeMessage() context aware
* make MergePullRequestForm.SetDefaults context aware
* use db.WithTx()
* pull.SetMerged only with context
* fix deadlock in `test-sqlite\#TestAPIBranchProtection`
* dont forget templates
* db.WithTx allow to set the parentCtx
* handle db transaction in service packages but not router
* issue_service.ChangeStatus just had caused another deadlock :/
it has to do something with how notification package is handled
* if we merge a pull in one database transaktion, we get a lock, because merge infoce internal api that cant handle open db sessions to the same repo
* ajust to current master
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* dont open db transaction in router
* make generate-swagger
* one _success less
* wording nit
* rm
* adapt
* remove not needed test files
* rm less diff & use attr in JS
* ...
* Update services/repository/files/commit.go
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* ajust db schema for PullAutoMerge
* skip broken pull refs
* more context in error messages
* remove webUI part for another pull
* remove more WebUI only parts
* API: add CancleAutoMergePR
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* fix lint
* Apply suggestions from code review
* cancle -> cancel
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* change queue identifyer
* fix swagger
* prevent nil issue
* fix and dont drop error
* as per @zeripath
* Update integrations/git_test.go
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Update integrations/git_test.go
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* more declarative integration tests (dedup code)
* use assert.False/True helper
Co-authored-by: 赵智超 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* prevent double click new issue/pull/comment button
when network is not good, these button maybe
double clicked, then more than one same issues
pulls or comments will be created. this pull
request will fix this bug.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* Add "Reference" section to Issue view sidebar
* Removed unneeded tailored CSS, added Fomantic UI classes
* Removed tailored CSS in favour of HTML-only approach
Kindly provided by @Gusted
* Added i18 translation key for reference link string
* Corrected spelling of "References:" to "Reference:" for reference link text
* Removed `Issue.ReferenceLink` in favour of a local template variable
Start making the mobile experience not painful and be actually usable. This contains a few smaller changes to enhance this experience.
- Submit buttons on the review forms aren't columns anymore and are now allowed to be displayed on one row.
- The label/milestone & New Issue buttons were given each own row even tough, there's enough place to do it one the same row. This commit fixes that.
- The issues+Pull tab on repo's has a third item besides the label/milestone & New Issue buttons, the search bar. On desktop there's enough place to do this on one row, for mobile it isn't, currently it was using for each item a new row. This commits fixes that by only giving the searchbar a new row and have the other two buttons on the same row.
- The notification table will now be show a scrollbar instead of overflow.
- The repo buttons(Watch, Star, Fork) on mobile were showing quite big and the SVG wasn't even displayed on the same line, if the count of those numbers were too high it would even overflow. This commit removes the SVG, as there isn't any place to show them on the same row and allows them to have a new row if the counts of those buttons are high.
- The admin page can show you a lot of interesting information, on mobile the System Status + Configuration weren't properly displayed as the margin's were too high. This commit fixes that by reducing the margin to a number that makes sense on mobile.
- Fixes to not overflow the tables but instead force them to be scrollable.
- When viewing a issue or pull request, the comments aren't full-width but instead 80% and aligned to right, on mobile this is a annoyance as there isn't much width to begin with. This commits fixes that by forcing full-width and removing the avatars on the left side and instead including them inline in the comment header.
* Fix word breaks in Chrome
This fixes word wrapping on the filename for a comment on a PR. A previous commit fixed this problem in Firefox, but not Chrome.
Fixes#16248
* Don't break Outdated badge
This prevents the Outdated badge on a PR from wrapping in the middle of the word for a comment on a long filename.
* Move word break to recommended element
* Add overflow-wrap per PR review
* Update web_src/less/helpers.less
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Adds a feature [like GitHub has](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-from-a-fork) (step 7).
If you create a new PR from a forked repo, you can select (and change later, but only if you are the PR creator/poster) the "Allow edits from maintainers" option.
Then users with write access to the base branch get more permissions on this branch:
* use the update pull request button
* push directly from the command line (`git push`)
* edit/delete/upload files via web UI
* use related API endpoints
You can't merge PRs to this branch with this enabled, you'll need "full" code write permissions.
This feature has a pretty big impact on the permission system. I might forgot changing some things or didn't find security vulnerabilities. In this case, please leave a review or comment on this PR.
Closes#17728
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
- Apparently `<input>` elements differ from other elements have a size
attribute that act as a `min-width` CSS property, this causes a overflow
on mobile. By setting this size to `1` it doesn't try to force a
min-width and nicely shrink down.
* By default force vertical tabs on mobile
- While experimenting with using vertical tabs instead of horizontal
tabs on gitea for a better mobile experience, I made a recent
PR(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19468) in order to see if
there was any objections to this new behavior for the repo headers(one
of the most annoying horizontal tabs). This PR had no objections and
even a user commenting that this change is brilliant.
- This PR now improves upon the previous PR by making this the de-facto
behavior for all menu's on mobile. The only exemption is the navbar
which also uses the menu but caught some layout errors with the changes.
* Fix organisation
* Fix repo/wiki buttons
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Use horizontal tabs for repo header on mobile
- The current behavior of the repo header on mobile is to display them
vertically column-by-column. I've only experience annoyance due to this
while trying to visit gitea instanced on mobile. This commit changes
this behavior to use horizontal tabs, it uses less tabs and doesn't
bloat 60% of your mobile screen with the repo headers.
- A small fix added in this commit is to give some space around the repo
buttons, current behavior is that they are too "close" to the repo
title.
* Fix lint
Reusing `/api/v1` from Gitea UI Pages have pros and cons.
Pros:
1) Less code copy
Cons:
1) API/v1 have to support shared session with page requests.
2) You need to consider for each other when you want to change something about api/v1 or page.
This PR moves all dependencies to API/v1 from UI Pages.
Partially replace #16052
- Upgrade all JS dependencies minus vue and vue-loader
- Adapt to breaking change of octicons
- Update eslint rules
- Tested Swagger UI, sortablejs and prod build
The last PR about clone buttons introduced an JS error when visiting an empty repo page:
* https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19028
* `Uncaught ReferenceError: isSSH is not defined`, because the variables are scoped and doesn't share between sub templates.
This:
1. Simplify `templates/repo/clone_buttons.tmpl` and make code clear
2. Move most JS code into `initRepoCloneLink`
3. Remove unused `CloneLink.Git`
4. Remove `ctx.Data["DisableSSH"] / ctx.Data["ExposeAnonSSH"] / ctx.Data["DisableHTTP"]`, and only set them when is is needed (eg: deploy keys / ssh keys)
5. Introduce `Data["CloneButton*"]` to provide data for clone buttons and links
6. Introduce `Data["RepoCloneLink"]` for the repo clone link (not the wiki)
7. Remove most `ctx.Data["PageIsWiki"]` because it has been set in the `/wiki` middleware
8. Remove incorrect `quickstart` class in `migrating.tmpl`
Extend issues/new/choose to pass the project id and change New Issue
link on project page to use new/choose
Fix#19170
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* Prevent double encoding of branch names in delete branch
There is a double encoding issue in branch template whereby the branch name
ends up double encoded.
Fix#18709
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* and tag name
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* And fix#18704
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This code adds a simple endpoint to apply patches to repositories and
branches on gitea. This is then used along with the conflicting checking
code in #18004 to provide a basic implementation of cherry-pick revert.
Now because the buttons necessary for cherry-pick and revert have
required us to create a dropdown next to the Browse Source button
I've also implemented Create Branch and Create Tag operations.
Fix#3880Fix#17986
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
