I neglected that the `NameKey` of `Unit` is not only for translation,
but also configuration. So it should be `repo.actions` to maintain
consistency.
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
If users already use `actions.actions` in `DISABLED_REPO_UNITS` or
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`, it will be treated as an invalid unit key.
Follow #21962
After I eat my own dogfood, I would say that
ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS=false is necessary for many private/enterprise
instances, because many private repositories do not have
"description/topic", users just want to search by their names.
This PR also adds `PageIsExploreRepositories` check, to make code more
strict, because the `search` template is shared for different purpose.
And during the test, I found a bug that the "Search" button didn't
respect the "relevant" parameter, so this PR fixes the bug by the way
together.
I think this PR needs to be backported.
Closes#20955
This PR adds the possibility to disable blank Issues, when the Repo has
templates. This can be done by creating the file
`.gitea/issue_config.yaml` with the content `blank_issues_enabled` in
the Repo.
- **Installation**: includes how to install Gitea and related other
tools, also includes upgrade Gitea
- **Administration**: includes how to configure Gitea, customize Gitea
and manage Gitea instance out of Gitea admin UI
- **Usage**: includes how to use Gitea's functionalities. A sub
documentation is about packages, in future we could also include CI/CD
and others.
- **Development**: includes how to integrate with Gitea's API, how to
develop new features within Gitea
- **Contributing**: includes how to contribute code to Gitea
repositories.
After this is merged, I think we can have a sub-documentation of `Usage`
part named `Actions` to describe how to use Gitea actions
---------
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Add some review features that are notably missing from Gitlab CE but not
Gitea.
Also add Merge Queues which is not supported by Gitea but is quite an
important feature.
This updates the PR docs and explains how to work with PRs, for those
who may not know.
It was mentioned that this page could explain PRs a bit better, in case
some users are not familiar with GitHub or similar forges.
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Creating pid file should not belong to setting package and only web
command needs that. So this PR moves pidfile creation from setting
package to web command package to keep setting package more readable.
I marked this as `break` because the PIDFile path moved. For those who
have used the pid build argument, it has to be changed.
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Ran most of the Less files through the Less compiler and Prettier and
then followed up with a round of manual fixes.
The Less compiler had unfortunately stripped all `//` style comments
that I had to restore (It did preserve `/* */` comments). Other fixes
include duplicate selector removal which were revealed after the
transpilation and which weren't caught by stylelint before but now are.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15565
Follow-up for #23458
I could have suggested this on the original PR, but I thought there
would be more to add. Hadn't noticed the push options docs already had
nearly the same shell command. 😅
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
CI is failing with the following:
```
docs/content/doc/features/localization.zh-cn.md:16 MD022/blanks-around-headings/blanks-around-headers Headings should be surrounded by blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below] [Context: "# 本地化"]
docs/content/doc/features/localization.zh-cn.md:23 MD022/blanks-around-headings/blanks-around-headers Headings should be surrounded by blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below] [Context: "## 支持的语言"]
```
This fixes that error
This PR adds support for reflogs on all repositories. It does this by
adding a global configuration entry.
Implements #14865
---------
Signed-off-by: Philip Peterson <philip.c.peterson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Fix scoped label left and right part breaking across lines.
* Remove slanted divider in scoped label display, make it straight.
After using this for a while, this feels more visually noisy than
helpful.
* Reduce contrast between scope and item to reduce probability of
unreadable text on background.
* Change documentation to remove mention of non-exclusive scoped labels.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
update documentation to include an overview of the yaml label template that is part of PR #22976
Signed-off-by: Jon Roadley-Battin <jon.roadleybattin@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
### The CustomEvent prefix
There was already `ce-quick-submit`, the `ce-` prefix seems better than
`us-`. Rename the only `us-` prefixed `us-load-context-popup` to `ce-`
prefixed.
### Styles and Attributes in Go HTML Template
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21855#issuecomment-1429643073
Suggest to stick to `class="c1 {{if $var}}c2{{end}}"`
The readability and maintainability should be applied to the code which
is read by developers, but not for the generated outputs.
The template code is the code for developers, while the generated HTML
are only for browsers.
The `class="c1 {{if $var}}c2{{end}}"` style is clearer for developers
and more intuitive, and the generated HTML also makes browsers happy (a
few spaces do not affect anything)
Think about a more complex case:
* `class="{{if $active}}active{{end}} menu item {{if $show}}show{{end}}
{{if $warn}}warn{{end}}"`
* --vs--
* `class="{{if $active}}active {{end}}menu item{{if $show}}
show{{end}}{{if $warn}} warn{{end}}"`
The first style make it clearer to see each CSS class name with its
`{{if}}` block.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
If an event listener must be `async`, the `e.preventDefault()` should be
before any `await`,
it's recommended to put it at the beginning of the function.
This PR refactors and improves the password hashing code within gitea
and makes it possible for server administrators to set the password
hashing parameters
In addition it takes the opportunity to adjust the settings for `pbkdf2`
in order to make the hashing a little stronger.
The majority of this work was inspired by PR #14751 and I would like to
thank @boppy for their work on this.
Thanks to @gusted for the suggestion to adjust the `pbkdf2` hashing
parameters.
Close#14751
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Close#22847
This PR:
* introduce Gitea's own `showElem` and related functions
* remove jQuery show/hide
* remove .hide class
* remove inline style=display:none
From now on:
do not use:
* "[hidden]" attribute: it's too weak, can not be applied to an element
with "display: flex"
* ".hidden" class: it has been polluted by Fomantic UI in many cases
* inline style="display: none": it's difficult to tweak
* jQuery's show/hide/toggle: it can not show/hide elements with
"display: xxx !important"
only use:
* this ".gt-hidden" class
* showElem/hideElem/toggleElem functions in "utils/dom.js"
cc: @silverwind , this is the all-in-one PR
As part of administration sometimes it is appropriate to forcibly tell
users to update their passwords.
This PR creates a new command `gitea admin user must-change-password`
which will set the `MustChangePassword` flag on the provided users.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Fixes#19555
Test-Instructions:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21441#issuecomment-1419438000
This PR implements the mapping of user groups provided by OIDC providers
to orgs teams in Gitea. The main part is a refactoring of the existing
LDAP code to make it usable from different providers.
Refactorings:
- Moved the router auth code from module to service because of import
cycles
- Changed some model methods to take a `Context` parameter
- Moved the mapping code from LDAP to a common location
I've tested it with Keycloak but other providers should work too. The
JSON mapping format is the same as for LDAP.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
