Template
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo synced 2024-11-25 19:26:09 +01:00
Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
silverwind c82bef515e
Migrate margin and padding helpers to tailwind (#30043)
This will conclude the refactor of 1:1 class replacements to tailwind,
except `gt-hidden`. Commands ran:

```bash
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-0#tw-$1$2-0#g'   {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-1#tw-$1$2-0.5#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-2#tw-$1$2-1#g'   {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-3#tw-$1$2-2#g'   {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-4#tw-$1$2-4#g'   {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-5#tw-$1$2-8#g'   {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/*
```

(cherry picked from commit 68ec9b48592fe88765bcc3a73093d43c98b315de)

Conflicts:
	routers/web/repo/view.go
	templates/base/head_navbar.tmpl
	templates/repo/code/recently_pushed_new_branches.tmpl
	templates/repo/diff/box.tmpl
	templates/repo/diff/compare.tmpl
	templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl
	templates/repo/header.tmpl
	templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
	templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
	templates/repo/issue/view_content/sidebar.tmpl
	templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl
	templates/repo/view_file.tmpl
	templates/shared/user/blocked_users.tmpl
	templates/status/500.tmpl
	web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
	resolved by prefering Forgejo version and applying the
	commands to all files
2024-03-30 07:17:29 +01:00
silverwind 2befd9a3cf
Replace 10 more gt- classes with tw- (#29945)
Likely the biggest change of the tailwind refactors. Only thing of note
is that `tw-flex-1` resolves to `flex: 1 1 0%` while our `gt-f1` was
`flex: 1 1 0`, I don't think it will make any difference. Commands I've
ran:

```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-vm#tw-align-middle#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-fw#tw-flex-wrap#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-f1#tw-flex-1#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-fc#tw-flex-col#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-sb#tw-justify-between#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-je#tw-justify-end#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-jc#tw-justify-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-ac#tw-content-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-df#tw-flex#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/*
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-dib#tw-inline-block#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/*

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f88ad5424f381bf2a45fd863b551c5a72891bb68)

Conflicts:
	templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl
	templates/repo/header.tmpl
	templates/repo/issue/filter_actions.tmpl
	templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
	templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
	templates/repo/release/list.tmpl
	templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl
	web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
	discard the proposed changes and prefer Forgejo. A followup
	commit will apply the same commands.
2024-03-26 19:04:27 +01:00
delvh 7960ba7e2b
Always use ctx.Locale.Tr inside templates (#27231) 2023-09-25 08:56:50 +00:00
wxiaoguang c17fd68be7
Show queue's active worker number (#26896) 2023-09-04 21:07:32 +08:00
silverwind e24f651c86
Add template linting via djlint (#25212)
So I found this [linter](https://github.com/Riverside-Healthcare/djlint)
which features a mode for go templates, so I gave it a try and it did
find a number of valid issue, like unbalanced tags etc. It also has a
number of bugs, I had to disable/workaround many issues.

Given that this linter is written in python, this does add a dependency
on `python` >= 3.8 and `poetry` to the development environment to be
able to run this linter locally.

- `e.g.` prefixes on placeholders are removed because the linter had a
false-positive on `placeholder="e.g. cn=Search"` for the `attr=value`
syntax and it's not ideal anyways to write `e.g.` into a placeholder
because a placeholder is meant to hold a sample value.
- In `templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl` I simplified the logic to
not conditionally create opening tags without closing tags because this
stuff confuses the linter (and possibly the reader as well).
2023-06-14 18:17:58 +00:00
wxiaoguang 58dfaf3a75
Improve queue & process & stacktrace (#24636)
Although some features are mixed together in this PR, this PR is not
that large, and these features are all related.

Actually there are more than 70 lines are for a toy "test queue", so
this PR is quite simple.

Major features:

1. Allow site admin to clear a queue (remove all items in a queue)
* Because there is no transaction, the "unique queue" could be corrupted
in rare cases, that's unfixable.
* eg: the item is in the "set" but not in the "list", so the item would
never be able to be pushed into the queue.
* Now site admin could simply clear the queue, then everything becomes
correct, the lost items could be re-pushed into queue by future
operations.
3. Split the "admin/monitor" to separate pages
4. Allow to download diagnosis report
* In history, there were many users reporting that Gitea queue gets
stuck, or Gitea's CPU is 100%
    * With diagnosis report, maintainers could know what happens clearly

The diagnosis report sample:
[gitea-diagnosis-20230510-192913.zip](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/files/11441346/gitea-diagnosis-20230510-192913.zip)
, use "go tool pprof profile.dat" to view the report.


Screenshots:


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/320659b4-2eda-4def-8dc0-5ea08d578063)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/c5c46fae-9dc0-44ca-8cd3-57beedc5035e)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/6168a811-42a1-4e64-a263-0617a6c8c4fe)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-11 07:45:47 +00:00
wxiaoguang 6f9c278559
Rewrite queue (#24505)
# ⚠️ Breaking

Many deprecated queue config options are removed (actually, they should
have been removed in 1.18/1.19).

If you see the fatal message when starting Gitea: "Please update your
app.ini to remove deprecated config options", please follow the error
messages to remove these options from your app.ini.

Example:

```
2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].ISSUE_INDEXER_QUEUE_TYPE`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]`
2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].UPDATE_BUFFER_LEN`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]`
2023/05/06 19:39:22 [F] Please update your app.ini to remove deprecated config options
```

Many options in `[queue]` are are dropped, including:
`WRAP_IF_NECESSARY`, `MAX_ATTEMPTS`, `TIMEOUT`, `WORKERS`,
`BLOCK_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_WORKERS`, they can be removed
from app.ini.

# The problem

The old queue package has some legacy problems:

* complexity: I doubt few people could tell how it works.
* maintainability: Too many channels and mutex/cond are mixed together,
too many different structs/interfaces depends each other.
* stability: due to the complexity & maintainability, sometimes there
are strange bugs and difficult to debug, and some code doesn't have test
(indeed some code is difficult to test because a lot of things are mixed
together).
* general applicability: although it is called "queue", its behavior is
not a well-known queue.
* scalability: it doesn't seem easy to make it work with a cluster
without breaking its behaviors.

It came from some very old code to "avoid breaking", however, its
technical debt is too heavy now. It's a good time to introduce a better
"queue" package.

# The new queue package

It keeps using old config and concept as much as possible.

* It only contains two major kinds of concepts:
    * The "base queue": channel, levelqueue, redis
* They have the same abstraction, the same interface, and they are
tested by the same testing code.
* The "WokerPoolQueue", it uses the "base queue" to provide "worker
pool" function, calls the "handler" to process the data in the base
queue.
* The new code doesn't do "PushBack"
* Think about a queue with many workers, the "PushBack" can't guarantee
the order for re-queued unhandled items, so in new code it just does
"normal push"
* The new code doesn't do "pause/resume"
* The "pause/resume" was designed to handle some handler's failure: eg:
document indexer (elasticsearch) is down
* If a queue is paused for long time, either the producers blocks or the
new items are dropped.
* The new code doesn't do such "pause/resume" trick, it's not a common
queue's behavior and it doesn't help much.
* If there are unhandled items, the "push" function just blocks for a
few seconds and then re-queue them and retry.
* The new code doesn't do "worker booster"
* Gitea's queue's handlers are light functions, the cost is only the
go-routine, so it doesn't make sense to "boost" them.
* The new code only use "max worker number" to limit the concurrent
workers.
* The new "Push" never blocks forever
* Instead of creating more and more blocking goroutines, return an error
is more friendly to the server and to the end user.

There are more details in code comments: eg: the "Flush" problem, the
strange "code.index" hanging problem, the "immediate" queue problem.

Almost ready for review.

TODO:

* [x] add some necessary comments during review
* [x] add some more tests if necessary
* [x] update documents and config options
* [x] test max worker / active worker
* [x] re-run the CI tasks to see whether any test is flaky
* [x] improve the `handleOldLengthConfiguration` to provide more
friendly messages
* [x] fine tune default config values (eg: length?)

## Code coverage:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/236620635-55576955-f95d-4810-b12f-879026a3afdf.png)
2023-05-08 19:49:59 +08:00