Follow https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/32383
This PR cleans up the "Deadline" usages in templates, make them call
`ParseLegacy` first to get a `Time` struct then display by `DateUtils`.
Now it should be pretty clear how "deadline string" works, it makes it
possible to do further refactoring and correcting.
(cherry picked from commit 259811617ba15c77ddd89360178a59251d611af2)
- Add a new script that proccess the localization files and verify that
they only contain HTML according to our strictly defined rules.
- This should make adding malicious HTML near-impossible.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5703
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- If you select a portion of the comment, `Quote reply` will not only
quote that portion and not copy paste the whole text as it previously
did. This is achieved by using the `@github/quote-selection` package.
- There's preprocessing to ensure Forgejo-flavored markdown syntax is
preserved.
- e2e test added.
- Resolves#1342
- Combine review requests comments similairy how labels comments are
combined. If review requests comments were made within 60 seconds of
each other they will be grouped.
- Integration and unit test added.
- Resolves#2774
fixes#22907
Tested:
- [x] issue content edit
- [x] issue content change tasklist
- [x] pull request content edit
- [x] pull request change tasklist
(cherry picked from commit aa92b13164e84c26be91153b6022220ce0a27720)
Conflicts:
models/issues/comment.go
c7a389f2b2 [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
trivial context conflicts
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
services/issue/comments.go
services/issue/content.go
user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo
routers/web/repo/issue.go
trivial difference from 6a0750177f Allow to save empty comment
user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates changed a lot in Forgejo but the change is
trivially ported
tests/integration/issue_test.go
other tests were added in the same region
web_src/js/features/repo-issue-edit.js
the code is still web_src/js/features/repo-legacy.js
trivially ported
This is a squashed result of conflict resolution for the following commits from Gitea:
- 36de5b299b
- 9a93b1816e
- 712e19fa6f
- 83850cc479
It is lacking CSS rule for archived labels, though.
Changes in this commit are authored by:
- 6543
- delvh
- silverwind
We have to define this one in helpers.css because tailwind only
generates a single class but certain things rely on this being
double-class. Command ran:
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-hidden#tw-hidden#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* web_src/css/**/*
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ec3d467f15a683b305ac165c3eba6683628dcb25)
Conflicts:
templates/install.tmpl
templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/sidebar.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_title.tmpl
resolved by prefering Forgejo version and applying the
commands to all files
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30005. Regression from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29945.
There was only once instance of `tw-content-center` before that PR, so I
just ran below command and reverted that one instance.
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#tw-content-center#tw-items-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/*
```
(cherry picked from commit 04f9ad056882fc3f21b247b16f84437adf0f36d8)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/header.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl
web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
re-ran the command after discarding the Gitea changes to
ensure all Forgejo files are also covered
Replace 18 `gt-` prefixes with `tw-` with perl replacement. I manually
checked them all with `rg` afterwards.
(cherry picked from commit a2e90014ec20a1085449a66061389cfe0d12260f)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/header.tmpl
because some of the header moved to header_fork.tmpl
The value passed into "attachments" sub-template is from
"RedneredContent", so use the same name for consistent. And it makes
readers easy to know its data type.
(cherry picked from commit b8a598e6a43fa65db23b88d3b3b281b5f2f7c2e0)
Str2html was abused a lot. So use a proper name for it: SanitizeHTML
And add some tests to show its behavior.
(cherry picked from commit fb42972c057364a1dc99dfb528554e7a94415be7)
Conflicts:
docs/content/administration/mail-templates.en-us.md
docs/content/administration/mail-templates.zh-cn.md
prefer their version always
This PR touches the most interesting part of the "template refactoring".
1. Unclear variable type. Especially for "web/feed/convert.go":
sometimes it uses text, sometimes it uses HTML.
2. Assign text content to "RenderedContent" field, for example: `
project.RenderedContent = project.Description` in web/org/projects.go
3. Assign rendered content to text field, for example: `r.Note =
rendered content` in web/repo/release.go
4. (possible) Incorrectly calling `{{Str2html
.PackageDescriptor.Metadata.ReleaseNotes}}` in
package/content/nuget.tmpl, I guess the name Str2html misleads
developers to use it to "render string to html", but it only sanitizes.
if ReleaseNotes really contains HTML, then this is not a problem.
(cherry picked from commit e71eb8930a5d0f60874b038c223498b41ad65592)
Conflicts:
modules/templates/util_string.go
trivial context conflict
Some specific events on Gitlab issues and merge requests are stored
separately from comments as "resource state events". With this change,
all relevant resource state events are downloaded during issue and merge
request migration, and converted to comments.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these types.
ref: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/resource_state_events.html
(cherry picked from commit 17f170ee3724d8bdf2ddaad4211b12433f78ff0e)
Follow #29165
* some of them are incorrect, which would lead to double escaping (eg:
`(print (Escape $.RepoLink)`)
* other of them are not necessary, because `Tr` handles strings&HTML
automatically
Suggest to review by "unified view":
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29394/files?diff=unified&w=0
(cherry picked from commit d2f6588b66549b33adf8bac7044d03c89d668470)
Conflicts:
templates/code/searchcombo.tmpl
templates/mail/auth/register_notify.tmpl
templates/mail/issue/default.tmpl
templates/repo/code/recently_pushed_new_branches.tmpl
templates/repo/search.tmpl
templates/repo/settings/protected_branch.tmpl
templates/user/auth/activate.tmpl
templates/user/auth/forgot_passwd.tmpl
templates/user/dashboard/feeds.tmpl
context
After this PR: no need to play with the Safe/Escape tricks anymore. See
the changes for more details.
(cherry picked from commit f9207b09479df964872d68842469991042b5497f)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/issue/view_title.tmpl
templates/user/settings/applications.tmpl
context
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for a new specific kind of event: Changing the
target branch of a PR. When detected, it is downloaded using Gitea's
type for this event, and eventually uploaded into Gitea in the expected
format, i.e. with no text content in the comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of this type.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L102)
(cherry picked from commit 6e5966597c2d498d1a8540dad965461d44ff8e57)
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for two specific kinds of events: Scheduling and
un-scheduling of automatic merges on a PR. When detected, they are
downloaded using Gitea's type for these events, and eventually uploaded
into Gitea in the expected format, i.e. with no text content in the
comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these two types.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L6-L17)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a70c00b80bcb5de8479e407f1b8f08dcf756019d)
It's possible for reviews to not be assiocated with users, when they
were migrated from another forge instance. In the migration code,
there's no sanitization check for author names, so they could contain
HTML tags and thus needs to be properely escaped.
Follow #29165. These HTML strings are safe to be rendered directly, to
avoid double-escaping.
(cherry picked from commit a784ed3d6c6946fd9bf95f2e910f52f549326fe2)
Clarify when "string" should be used (and be escaped), and when
"template.HTML" should be used (no need to escape)
And help PRs like #29059 , to render the error messages correctly.
(cherry picked from commit f3eb835886031df7a562abc123c3f6011c81eca8)
Conflicts:
modules/web/middleware/binding.go
routers/web/feed/convert.go
tests/integration/branches_test.go
tests/integration/repo_branch_test.go
trivial context conflicts
- Use maintained fork https://github.com/golangci/misspell
- Rename `mispell-check` to `lint-spell`, add `lint-spell-fix`
- Run `lint-spell` in separate actions step
- Lint more files, fix discovered issues
- Remove inaccurate and outdated info in docs (we do not need GOPATH for
tools anymore)
Maybe later we can add more spellchecking tools, but I have not found
any good ones yet.
(cherry picked from commit 9c39f8515fa88d644736c6773d7a05d070a02e82)
Conflicts:
.github/workflows/pull-compliance.yml
Makefile
- When a commit references a pull request, the detail strings should
reflect that. Add a new translation string for the pull request.
- Added integration tests.
- Resolves#2256
(cherry picked from commit 0d054cd4d9)
When an assignee changed event comment is rendered, most of it is
guarded behind the assignee ID not being 0. However, if it is 0, that
results in quite broken rendering for that comment and the next one.
This can happen, for example, when repository data imported from outside
of Gitea is incomplete.
This PR makes sure comments with an assignee ID of 0 are not rendered at
all.
---
Screenshot before:
<img width="272" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2023-11-05 um 20 12 18"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/42910/7d629d76-fee4-4fe5-9e3a-bf524050cead">
The comments in this screenshot are:
1. A regular text comment
2. A user being unassigned
3. A user being assigned
4. The title of the PR being changed
Comments 2 and 3 are rendered without any text, which indents the next
comment and does not leave enough vertical space.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- The review type '22' is a general comment type that is attached to
single codecomments, reviews with multiple comments or to simple approve
and request changes comment. This comment can be used to create a link
towards this action on an pull request.
- Adds an anchor to the review comment type, so that when its getting
linked to it, it actually jumps towards that event.
- This also now fixes the behavior that after you created a review you
will be redirected to that review and because this is an general comment
type other mails will also be 'fixed' such as the approved or request
changes.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1248
(cherry picked from commit 1741a5f1fe)
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@caesarschinas.com>
Part of #27065
This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
Each change is tested manually line by line. There are too many changes
so I can't share dozens of screenshots.
In short:
1. `ui right` could be still used in `ui top attached header`, because
there is a special case.
2. A lot of `ui right` are just no-op, so they can be removed safely.
3. Some of the `ui right` should be replaced by `gt-float-right` (to
avoid breaking, leave them to the future).
4. A few of the `ui right` could be rewritten by flex.
