mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo
synced 2024-11-25 03:06:10 +01:00
[BUG] Ensure HasIssueContentHistory
takes into account comment_id
- The content history table contains the content history of issues and comments. For issues they are saved with an comment id of zero. - If you want to check if the issue has an content history, it should take into account that SQL has `comment_id = 0`, as it otherwise could return incorrect results when for example the issue already has an comment that has an content history. - Fix the code of `HasIssueContentHistory` to take this into account, it relied on XORM to generate the SQL from the non-default values of the struct, this wouldn't generate the `comment_id = 0` SQL as `0` is the default value of an integer. - Remove an unncessary log (it's not the responsibility of `models` code to do logging). - Adds unit test. - Resolves #2513
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0e5af7079
commit
331fa44956
|
@ -172,15 +172,7 @@ func FetchIssueContentHistoryList(dbCtx context.Context, issueID, commentID int6
|
|||
|
||||
// HasIssueContentHistory check if a ContentHistory entry exists
|
||||
func HasIssueContentHistory(dbCtx context.Context, issueID, commentID int64) (bool, error) {
|
||||
exists, err := db.GetEngine(dbCtx).Cols("id").Exist(&ContentHistory{
|
||||
IssueID: issueID,
|
||||
CommentID: commentID,
|
||||
})
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
log.Error("can not fetch issue content history. err=%v", err)
|
||||
return false, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
return exists, err
|
||||
return db.GetEngine(dbCtx).Where("issue_id = ? AND comment_id = ?", issueID, commentID).Exist(new(ContentHistory))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// SoftDeleteIssueContentHistory soft delete
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -78,3 +78,16 @@ func TestContentHistory(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
assert.EqualValues(t, 7, list2[1].HistoryID)
|
||||
assert.EqualValues(t, 4, list2[2].HistoryID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestHasIssueContentHistory(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensures that comment_id is into taken account even if it's zero.
|
||||
_ = issues_model.SaveIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 1, 11, 100, timeutil.TimeStampNow(), "c-a", true)
|
||||
_ = issues_model.SaveIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 1, 11, 100, timeutil.TimeStampNow().Add(5), "c-b", false)
|
||||
|
||||
hasHistory1, _ := issues_model.HasIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 11, 0)
|
||||
assert.False(t, hasHistory1)
|
||||
hasHistory2, _ := issues_model.HasIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 11, 100)
|
||||
assert.True(t, hasHistory2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue